The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


FURORE OVER MINISTER DEMETRIOU, AGAIN!

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Bananiot » Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:10 pm

Well, if you are referring to the analytical programmes, someone whispered the names that make up the sub committees to "Alitheia" newspaper and you can find an exclusive list in last Saturday's edition.

However, I cannot really see the point of your question. We can all have our opinion on the events that took place in our time and have not yet found their way in official school text books. Especially when a system is in use where our side is always portrayed as the good one and the other side(s) is always the evil one. This will change in the new books, to the dismay of the bigots. We need to create citizens with a broad mind. Narrow mindness has cost us half our country. Let's have no more that.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby DT. » Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:42 pm

Bananiot wrote:Well, if you are referring to the analytical programmes, someone whispered the names that make up the sub committees to "Alitheia" newspaper and you can find an exclusive list in last Saturday's edition.

However, I cannot really see the point of your question. We can all have our opinion on the events that took place in our time and have not yet found their way in official school text books. Especially when a system is in use where our side is always portrayed as the good one and the other side(s) is always the evil one. This will change in the new books, to the dismay of the bigots. We need to create citizens with a broad mind. Narrow mindness has cost us half our country. Let's have no more that.



Thats not what I'm saying. Has the file on Cyprus finally been opened and we have the whole story or has akel decided that this is what happened and this is what they'll teach our kids?
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Bananiot » Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:15 pm

Which file DT?
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby Paphitis » Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:25 pm

doesntmatter wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
doesntmatter wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
Bananiot wrote:Actually I did miss her question but really she should ask the Minister, I can not speak for him. I she were to ask for my opinion, I would say TMT and EOKA B'. Unfortunately, other organisations such as "the organisation" and armed groups organised by various warlords to "protect" us, cannot be given the label terrorist yet, probably because this will tarnish the image of some important members of our society, dead or alive. History will take care of this in due course, no doubt.


The "organisation" you refer to wouldn't be EOKA by any chance? :?


Go to the top of the class. :lol:


So what is so illegal about GCs fighting for their self determination?


What's legal about shooting civilians and women in the back?

The illegal eoka terrorists were not fighting for "self determination", they were murdering people for enosis.


Who gives a stuff.

There was a war and the Anglo Americans and the Israelis have taught us that in any war, you have collateral damage.

If you want to harp on about the 2 women who were shot, then you should also do the same about the thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians who were also killed, or the Palestinian civilians who have been killed by the Israelis. While we are at it, you could also condemn the innocent GC and TC civilians that TMT slaughtered. Otherwise shut your mouth, because the lives of these 2 British women are no more valuable than the life of an Iraqi, or Palestinian in Gaza.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Paphitis » Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:33 pm

Bananiot wrote:Paphitis, stop making a fool of yourself. If you do not know about the "organisation" then you know nothing about the Cyprus issue. Do some homework but I could just give you a hint. Yiorgadjis was the leader and Papadopoulos the deputy and it was formed after independence.


And what did Pappadopoulos or Yiorgadjis do to earn the title of "extremist"?

Can you please identify just one part of that infamous text which proves that both these gentlemen are extremists and not merely just trying to redress the balance.

I take issue with the way the RoC is now rewriting the history books. It seems to suggest that either the old history books were a load of crap to begin with, or they are changing the history books to make them more palatable to Turks. Either way, it does not say much about the RoC or the Department of Education.

History cannot be manipulated just because the country has a problem. Very immature if you ask me.

The way some Cypriots losers attack their very own fallen and those that served the country is also disgusting, and something which you don't find in other countries.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Bananiot » Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:57 am

Of course you take issue Paphitis. It wouldn't be otherwise. Very typical reactionist response to anything that disturbs the stereotype.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby Paphitis » Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:45 am

Bananiot wrote:Of course you take issue Paphitis. It wouldn't be otherwise. Very typical reactionist response to anything that disturbs the stereotype.


What stereotype are you referring too? Perhaps you forget that we have never met and you know nothing about me.

Does it have anything to do with this:
Oracle was on one of the bikes, mascarating as Paphitis. Humanist surely will not now claim that all GC's are barbarians.


Very charming comment from a supposedly educated man who is old enough to know better. :roll:

Also, you did not answer my question:

And what did Pappadopoulos or Yiorgadjis do to earn the title of "extremist"?

Can you please identify just one part of that infamous text which proves that both these gentlemen are extremists and not merely just trying to redress the balance?
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Bananiot » Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:59 am

Glad you have a sense of humour this Monday morning. What infamous text are you talking about anyway? I specifically talked about the Organisation (which you seem to know nothing about) and members of which were responsible for taking sick, innocent TC's away from their hospital beds and execute them. Yiorgadjis was the leader and Papadopoulos the deputy of the Organisation which was armed by Makarios. Do you not feel any disgust about this?
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby Paphitis » Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:12 am

Bananiot wrote:Glad you have a sense of humour this Monday morning. What infamous text are you talking about anyway? I specifically talked about the Organisation (which you seem to know nothing about) and members of which were responsible for taking sick, innocent TC's away from their hospital beds and execute them. Yiorgadjis was the leader and Papadopoulos the deputy of the Organisation which was armed by Makarios. Do you not feel any disgust about this?


Really? :shock:

You make a very big sweeping statement by claiming that Papadopoulos and Yiorgadjis were responsible for taking innocent sick TCs from their hospital beds and executing them. Such an event should be recording somewhere.

I hope you have the proof to back it up?

The infamous text I am talking about is the one that was allegedly authored by "Defkalion".

And no, I do not feel any disgust about the actions of Makarios, Pappadopoulos, or Yiorgadjis who were merely protecting Cypriot sovereignty from TMT separatists.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Bananiot » Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:55 am

From the book "First partition"

The Cyprus Republic, which was established in 1960, collapsed in 1963 after Archbishop Makarios’ 13-points proposal for the amendment of the constitution. A detailed account of the ensuing crisis is given in Makarios Droushiotis’ book The First Partition, which has been published in English. The excerpt below details the shocking events of December1963 as Cyprus hovered on the brink of war with Turkey.

The Turkish Cypriot extremist organisation TMT had been active in Cyprus since 1959, while in 1961 the then Interior Minister Polycarpos Yiorkadjis, with the blessing of Makarios, had set up a Greek Cypriot equivalent known as the ‘Organisation’. Neither group believed in the Republic and nor did Makarios, who had not given up the aim of Union with Greece, despite his assurances that his only concern was the improvement of the constitution.

At the beginning of December 1963, the General Staff of the Greek Army prepared a study on the situation in Cyprus. This study, signed by the Chief of Staff Ioannis Pipiles, records the four stages which were outlined in the ‘Makarios Plan’ for the achievement of Enosis:

a. Stage 1: Attack against the negative points of the Constitution.

b. Stage 2: Denunciation of the Treaty of Guarantee

c. Stage 3: Self-Determination

d. Stage 4: Submission of application to the “Greek Government to accept the unification of CYPRUS with the Greek Core”.

On 3 December 1963, three days after Makarios’ proposals for constitutional revision had been communicated to the Turks, members of the Organisation blew up the statue of EOKA hero Markos Drakos near Paphos Gate in Nicosia. The Greek Cypriot leadership blamed the Turkish Cypriots and the first anti-Turkish demonstrations took place in Nicosia, while the Organisation went into a state of emergency. Some of its members, on instructions from the leadership, patrolled the Turkish enclaves in order to monitor Turkish Cypriot movements. The climate in the capital deteriorated rapidly and everybody braced themselves for the impending clash.

A tripartite committee under Rauf Denktash set about preparing the Turkish Cypriot answer to Makarios’ proposals. On 20 December, British High Commissioner Sir Arthur Clark had meetings with Makarios and Vice-President Fazil Küçük in Nicosia. The British diplomat, who was leaving for London on holiday, received assurances from Küçük that the Turkish Cypriots were working on their answer, which was due to be submitted to the Greek Cypriot side at the beginning of January. Makarios assured Clark that he would not be making any moves before receiving the Turkish Cypriot answer, which he said he would study carefully. Makarios told Clark he could go to London and enjoy his holiday in peace. Clark was surprised by their moderate approach, but, taking stock of the situation on the island, he told Fraser Wilkins, the American Ambassador, that “there would be no new developments in the immediate future, unless there should be some bombing incident”.

Only 24 hours after Clark’s assessment, there was indeed an incident, which provided the spark for a general clash between Greek and Turkish Cypriot para-state organisations. At dawn on 21 December, one of Yiorkadjis’ armed patrols clashed with some Turkish Cypriots. Shots were exchanged and two Turkish Cypriots were killed. In Nicosia, which was already a powder keg, there was little patience for more sober reflection. The crisis rapidly escalated and, on 23 December, clashes broke out all over town.

At lunchtime on 23 December, Makarios and Küçük addressed a joint appeal to the Greeks and Turks of Cyprus “to put an end to the fighting between them”. This intervention from the Repubic’s President and Vice-president had no real influence on events. The fighting continued, and 10 people were killed - nine Turkish Cypriots and one Greek Cypriot. Twenty people were injured, 13 Greek Cypriots and seven Turkish Cypriots.

At 10 in the evening, Makarios made another appeal to the people, asking them to refrain from any unlawful act or provocation. Vice-president Küçük addressed a similar message but to no avail. On the morning of 24 December, the clashes in Nicosia spread along the entire length of the line separating the Turkish quarter from the rest of the town. The fiercest fighting took place in Kaimakli, Constantia, Neapolis, Ledra Palace and especially Omorphita, where the armed groups of Vassos Lyssarides and Nicos Sampson fought side by side. According to American sources there were 17 dead, most of them Turkish Cypriots, and 70 wounded.

Makarios requested a meeting with Küçük in the presence of the Acting British High Commissioner and the American Ambassador. The meeting took place at midday on December 24 at the Paphos Gate police station, between the Greek and Turkish sectors of Nicosia. The Turkish Cypriot representatives attended the meeting unshaven, denouncing the fact that the water supply network had been cut off, and protesting vigorously to Makarios about the imposition of a total blockade on the population. Küçük raised the humanitarian issue of 800 Turkish Cypriots who had moved from the Omorphita area to the Turkish sector of Nicosia inside the walls and were living in squalid conditions, without water or food. One side blamed the other for the incidents, as well as for the failure to implement the ceasefire. It was decided to set up a mixed team under the president of the House of Representatives, Glafkos Clerides, Defence Minister Osman Orek, Interior Minister Yiorkadjis and Agriculture Minister Fasil Plümer, who would oversee the ceasefire and ensure a return to normality. Clerides and Orek undertook to visit the areas where fighting had taken place and make sure that the wounded were attended to. This committee failed entirely in its mission.

In the American Ambassador’s view, Makarios and Küçük were trying to secure a ceasefire, but that “Greek and Turkish Cypriot extremist groups and especially EOKA [meaning the Organisation] are out of control”. The British found Clerides’ efforts to secure a ceasefire during the meeting at Paphos Gate extremely constructive. However, in the case of Yiorkadjis, who controlled 80 per cent of the Greek Cypriot military forces, they noted that he had made no contribution at all to that end.

At midnight on December 24, and in view of the escalation of hostilities especially in the Omorphita area, Turkey took the decision to ask the other two guarantor powers to mount a joint intervention in Cyprus. On December 25, Turkey’s Prime Minister Ismet Inönü sent an ultimatum to Makarios that, if the attacks did not cease, Turkey would intervene militarily. At 2.30 that afternoon, three Turkish fighter jets flew at low altitude over Nicosia, while four Turkish ships appeared north of Kyrenia. At 3.20pm, the Turkish Military Contingent left its camp in Yerolakos, west of Nicosia, and moved towards Gönyeli. The movements of the Turkish troops sowed panic among the Greek Cypriot leadership, which now dreaded a Turkish intervention in Cyprus. Through the British High Commissioner, therefore, it threatened that if the Turkish Contingent did not halt its movements, 300 Turkish Cypriots being held hostage at the Kykkos Gymnasium in Nicosia would be executed. The Turkish Cypriots had been detained by irregulars a cting on Sampson’s orders in the Omorphita area.

According to the Greek Cypriot leadership’s operation plans, in the event of a clash, the Organisation would become responsible for the protection of the Greek Cypriots, with the assistance and cooperation of the Greek Military Contingent. However, as soon as hostilities broke out, those Greek officers, who were members of the Organisation’s commanding staff, abandoned its headquarters.

Chrysafis Chrysafi, an officer in the Cyprus army who was transferred to the Organisation, describes the scene where Yiorkadjis, clearly annoyed, was ringing the Greek Military Contingent’s commander, Colonel Tzouvelakis, requesting he keep to the promises he had made. “It appears that ELDYK’s (the Greek Contingent’s) commander was telling him he had orders that every single soldier should stay in camp. ‘What’s to become of us, we have no weapons, nothing,’ Yiorkadjis told him. Tzouvelakis must have replied something and Yiorkadjis retorted furiously: ‘Screw you, Commander’. Tzouvelakis answered back to Georkadjis, who replied, ‘Screw you again,’ and slammed the phone down”.

According to Chrysafis, Yiorkadjis, beyond himself with rage, ordered a van to be brought to him. “We went out on the street and requisitioned the first van passing by. Yiorkadjis ordered Kyriacos Patatakos to fit loudspeakers on it and then he sent his men outside ELDYK’s barracks, calling on the soldiers to come out”.

Makarios asked Greece for military support, but the response was negative. Turkey was threatening to invade and Greece was refusing to help. Makarios finally realised that the situation was grave. He then put the blame for the dramatic turn of events on Yiorkadjis and the Organisation and set out on foot from the Presidential Palace to the Organisation’s headquarters in the nearby government housing complex to assess the situation first hand.

The Organisation’s leadership was in a meeting. “There was panic and confusion and nobody knew what to do when we were told that Makarios was on his way to the headquarters on foot,” Chrysafis explained. “Yiorkadjis was not in a position to face him and he asked Clerides to try and appease him. He then hid himself behind a large curtain so that Makarios would not become aware of his presence”.

Clerides stayed there and took the brunt of Makarios’ fury, as the latter pounded his staff angrily on the table. “Why did you start the troubles? You will ruin the country with your idiocies,” he yelled furiously, while Clerides tried to calm him down. “An attempt was made to convince the Archbishop that it was not our fault and that it was the Turks who had started it all first, which was not, in fact, true,” said Chrysafis.

What took place at the Organisation’s headquarters was indicative of the irresponsibility of the Cypriot political leadership. Fixing loudspeakers to a van so that the Greek soldiers would come out of their barracks, Yiorkadjis hiding like a little boy behind a curtain to avoid Makarios’ wrath, and the latter pounding his staff on the table in despair reveals the astonishing thoughtlessness with which the Greek Cypriot leadership provoked and then handled a crisis that brought Cyprus to the brink of war with Turkey.

The price Cyprus paid as a result of this latest crisis was an agreement on the first form of separation in Nicosia. Following long negotiations, a memorandum was signed on December 30 which set the boundaries of a neutral zone - under British control - dividing the Greek and Turkish sectors of the city. This zone was drawn on the map with a green pencil and therefore came to be known as the Green Line.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests