Viewpoint wrote:It is not very difficult to understand but you seem to be blocking out what is obvious even if the North state is reduced to 25% or 29% as in the AP if desired the GCs can use their numerical advantage to gain the balance in their favor and get what they want total control over the whole island leaving us just another minority exposed to a hostile revenge seeking majority. Is this a possiblity? if the answer is yes then how do you expect us to take such a leap of faith.
No VP, it is you who is trying to not accept reality, that the TC's will need to give back much more land than you want to. This is the only way you are ever going to be able to run the north state (TC state) under your control, hence the 5 seats in the Upper House. You are too stuck on the 25%-29% Annan Plan provided for the TC's. The AP was not GOD sent command etched in stone from Mount Sinai. The amount of land you are talking about in giving back, only satisfies 90,000+ GC's as Skipper pointed out which you seemed to have ignored. Another 9%-10% more land needs to be given back to satisfy the remaining 90,000+ GC to return to their properties.
The reason why the AP was able to give the TC's 25%-29% land, was because it had Racist policies in place to only allow 33,000 GC's into the TC state and telling the remaining 60,000+ "too bad", you can never return back to your homes and land. But now that Cyprus is in the EU, there is no way you can prevent the remaining 60,000+ GC's from returning back to their properties with the Freedom of Movement. You have a choice to make, to hang on to 25%-29% of the land in the north state and allow 90,000+ GC's to come and live with you, with them taking active roll in local and national politics that will threaten the Upper House's 5 seats, or you return those lands back and reduce the 90,000+ GC's from the north TC state where you will have complete control of the local and national seats in the government allocated to the north state. There is no other way around this problem, so you do control your own political destiny in having a say so in running the "New Cyprus". You cannot have it both ways, and this is the reality that you need to come to terms with. Once you do, the rest will fall in place nicely for the TC's in the north.
Viewpoint wrote:Lets hear your other ways to ensure we guarantee the 5 5 balance, you appear to now understand the importance so that's why you have generated alternatives to address this issue, thank you for showing that you are trying to create a system whereby the TCs are safeguarded against a hostile majority that could exploit their power to the detrement of TCs not allowing them an effective say in the running of a united Cyprus. I still dont feel that the GCs would accept sharing the upper house 5 5 if they do not have the open door you have allowed them to take control of the whole island.
I will get to my other idea in preserving the 5 Upper seats at another time. I'm beginning to see why you are concerned with the numbers of TC's versus the number of GC's, is because the 250,000+ TC's citizens in the north now, are not true figures but a made up numbers that include the settlers. There are no more that 100,000 True TC's in the north, if that, so that's were the problem lies with the TC's by trying to keep up to 29% of the land in the north. The rest of the numbers are settlers (if that)with "TC citizenship's", which will be decided just how many the GC's will accept to be included in the final numbers as TC's for the north. It does not mean all the remaining settlers will go back and that's not the point of this discussion, but they will not have a voting rights to in effect help you keep the 5 Upper House seats intact by keeping 29% of the land in the north.
The Upper House seats cannot be given to each community as their own to be made permanent,then you are in effect denying everyone to participate politically in the state they live in. If it were to be allowed just for the sake of argument to have it the way you want, then that will be a further bad news for thew TC's, because then you will need to then give 5 Upper seats to the Cypriot Armenians and 5 seats to Cypriot Maronites, and it they were to band with the GC's as I'm sure they will, then the Upper seats will be 15 to 5 against the TC's. After all, every community will get 5 seats, so how can you deny them the same rights as given to the GC's and the TC's. You can't use the 1960 constitution as an argument as them not being one of the two "partners", because even AP gave them 1 seat each. Again, you can see clearly of the AP's Racist intentions. There is no other way to deal with this. 5 seats in the Upper House per each state and each state will then become equal partners in the Upper House, and not the communities, or else the Armenians and the Maronites will be able to challenge the TC's and the GC's being discriminated against.
Viewpoint wrote:Arent the laws made at the federal level above those of the states? so they influence state legistlators, with your plan the balance is in the favor of the south state so even if the balance went from 10 40 to 5 35 we cannot stop bills being passed, the real test is in the upper house if we lose the balance in favor of the GCs then the past sufferings would have been for nothing. What I am fighting against as a GC adminsitered Democracy where my children will have a voice and not be pushed to one side and discriminated against just for being a Turkish Cypriot. You want to throw them into the fire in the name of democracy and those that want to dominate and control them namely the GCs. You fear and trust the Turks as much as I do the GCs.
Very few laws made in the Federal level will ever effect the 2 states, and if it did, it will effect both the states equally and not one more than the other. The Federal laws and Constitution will be made in protecting all Cypriots, and that is why it is very important for the TC's to get all their concerns regarding "safeguards" in to the Federal Constitution so that they are part of the Federal Laws. You should have more concerns about Presidents Executive Powers that does not require consent from the Upper or Lower Houses. Down the road some more laws can be added or changed, but local state government is where it counts in running your schools, social services, public works, state senate and on and on which the Federal Government has no control over. You should be more concern about the local government seats than the Federal government seats, and you can have them both. All it will take, is by giving the right amount of GC's land back, and those few thousands that will stay or will decide to come later to live in the north state, will have no effect on the north states political system at all. You continual insistence that my plan will leave the door open to be run over by the GC's greater numbers in the future therefore we should avoid being a Democratic country is as far fetched as wanting to leave the planet Earth for another planet, because the Sun will one day swallow us.!