erolz wrote:magikthrill wrote:and erol the fact that it was some 500 years ago makes a big difference to the situation between cyprus and the US one of the many reasons why it is not an apt analogy.
It was not an anology. It was an attempt to show the falacy of the argument that the legality of a state is defined by wether the peopel of that state owned the land the state is based on or took it from others. If the argument was that the legality of a state is based on wether the people owned the land it is based on or took it form others within a given time period (how long would that be 50 years, 100years, 300years, 500 years or 1000 years ago) - then depending on where you placed this aribitary time element the example of the USA could be considered irreleveant. this was not the the argument however.
so what, according to you, defines a state?
seizing weak peoples land, barricading it with powerful military troops and controlling your own affairs?
if its like that email me if you want a visa to enter my country. its in my backyard