Hello Zan,
All the evidence we have on this thread reflects very badly on your continual fabrication of the 1959 Zürich agreements being stolen from you and that the RoC is denying your rights under those agreements, or any part of those agreements have been amended, or armed guards prevented the TC's back to the government. You have produced a lot of copy paste documents but nothing that supported your above claims. In fact, most of your documents confirm that we decided we did not need the constitution anymore, hence the fact Küçük walked out of the RoC government and never wanted to return back, despite Inönü's pleas to him. You say of course, "yes but, Makarios was putting obstacles in Küçüks way to make life difficult for him". Give me a freaking break Zan. What the hell do you think the rest of the TC's had to endure during those times , specially between 1963-1968. Do you think it was picnic time for them. Our people have been made to suffer so that they can be used as pawns to push for partition at some point, because there is no other explanation the actions Küçük took. I know you want to hang onto his own words from his book that Makarios made it difficult for him to return and you think you can use this statement to win this argument with me when all the other information you produced along with Tim's Inönü letter's translation indicated that he had no intentions of going back. Tell me something Zan. Why do you suppose the Inönü letters were kept hidden for such a long time.? Was it so that people like you can create your own version of how we lost our place in the RoC government so that you can do your propaganda work. Now tell me another thing. Does Küçük mention Inönü letters in his biography, because if he doesn't, it would mean that he too did not want anyone else to know about it. Surely such an important letter must appear in his Biography. Since Tim is reading Küçük's book and you are not, perhaps he can tell us at some state.
Here is the reaction of our friend Bananiot when he found out about the Inönu letters.
Bananiot wrote:I have just read a letter sent by Inonu, Prime Minister of Turkey, to Kucuk, the leader of the Turkish Cypriot community, in March 1964. Inonu was begging the Turkish Cypriots to return to the RoC! Kucuk, a moderate politician, replied that the Turkish Cypriots would rather emigrate to Turkey than return.
How do you explain this? How does anyone explain this?
Just how do you explain this, Zan.? Well, you can't and now you are trying to sweep the Inönü letter issue under the carpet because you cannot defend it because of all the damage it caused to the TC's legal place in the RoC and the world. Well, if that wasn't bad enough, then our friend Tim translated another article today with the following from yet another thread.
Translation of the Afrika article by Turgut Afşaroğlu first published on 5 January 2009.
"International law says: - An international agreement, for example the 1960 Cyprus Agreements, retains its validity until a new one is concluded in its place. What did we do after 1974? We imagined that the Republic of Cyprus did not exist. Pushing to one side the fact that the guarantors’ sole right was to restore the broken-down Constitutional order, we abandoned our rights in the Republic of Cyprus. Denktash was elected Republic of Cyprus Vice-President in 1973. He had the right to continue in this capacity until 1978. However, no sooner had the TCFS been founded in 1975 than he abandoned this post. It is unclear whom he asked, from whom he obtained authority. If he had remained in this post until the end, he would have been able to veto the Republic of Cyprus’s unilateral EU entry and the Greek Cypriot side would have been unable to accede to the EU on its own".
http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.p ... &start=360
So, just like Küçük, Denktash also decided to risk everything and he too did not take his place in the RoC, but you still complain about the RoC entering the EU without the TC's approval and now you are hoping against hope that the EU will prevent Cyprus from using her veto vote power against Turkey and the "trnc", should they ever be recognised in the future, by having a proportional voting rights within the EU. Keep keeping your fingers cross Zan, but not likly to happen. Küçük and Denktash were both too short sighted on the power they had in the RoC government and they let it slip away, and now we want them back, but since Denktash also agreed on a BBF, the new constitution will not be the same as the last one that you keep asking for, when our leaders gave it away on our behalf, but you still think they were HEROES.