Oracle wrote:YFred wrote:Oracle wrote:denizaksulu wrote:Oracle wrote:denizaksulu wrote:Thanks for the confirmation of what I said Oracle mou.I cant help but notice the extra bit of information you kept there. Very thoughtful of you.
Just for the sake of completion ... don't want to be accused of snipping ends!I could have just posted this bit, and it would have been enough I guess ...
Nicosia was first inhabited over 5000 years ago. It was first known as Ledra during the Hellenistic period, but later the name was changed to Lefkothea under the Ptolemists.
The relevance to the topic is duly noticed.Efkharisto polla
Do you think the Ptolemists spoke with a lithp?
Dear Oracle, Thank you for that information but there is really no need to shout.
On the internet, bold and large size fonts are considered to be shouting.
If you wish to communicate with us I am afraid you will need to change your habits. Most of us Lurucadis are gentle folk and all that.
It's hard to be heard above all you Turk-TCs .... How many of you on the forum now?
More than there are in the "trnc" I'll bet!.... besides, you live in London!
I am really worried about you and your state of mind. You seem to be excessively obsessed with Hellenism. Not everything has a Hellenism angle. What’s should also be very really worrying for you is that the state of obsessive behaviour is the first step towards madness. The real question for you is how far have you progressed with it.
I intend to start up a discussion on Hellenism, even though it has become totally irrelevant since Greece and now Cyprus, and sooner or later Turkey and Northern Cyprus will join the EU. It’s not that different to discussing the Latin language, but at least other languages are based on that, which makes it worthwhile.
Now, Hellenism has been a discredited idea since the demise of Mussolini in Italy, and the Third Reich in Germany to name but a few. They had exactly the same ideas. However that is a different subject altogether and I promise you I will begin a discussion on Hellenism and its value for today’s world as well as more pressing topics like the discussions currently taking place which has a huge importance for all Cypriots.
The little amount of contribution you have made to this discussion compared to the number posts you have sent is incredible. Its seem you decide how much you will lets us know. Hence your contribution to this discussion has very little use. We need to know not only what information but from what source so we can check it.
I repeat what I said before. This is about finding the origin of Lurucina, nothing more nothing less. We appreciate all the contribution that has been made from everyone so far. For me it has been touching that during late 60s and early 70’s I should spend so much of time almost on top of such a historical site like Mallura and yet be oblivious to its existance. Through no fault of my own you understand. I was dodging the bullets at time with little Greek flags on it. But that’s another storey.
Whilst you and your obsessively Hellenic friends find it funny to try score points about the language it is written in, the grammar or the geography, I suspect you are actually so scared of what we may find that you are actually trying to deflect our effort. Now, Babadobillos ( excuse the spelling it is deliberate) tried do that in the negotiations to stop them, and failed miserably. So will you and your obsessive Hellenic friends.
Regards.