Paphitis wrote:T_C wrote:Paphitis wrote:Doesn'tfuckinghaveanidea wrote:20,000 Greek soldiers brough to Cyprus to ensure a successful enosis and you come up with this crap.
Papitis, you are funny.
Those Greek troops which were in actual fact only 12,000, where bought in to resist the planned Turkish invasion which would have annexed and partitioned part of the island.
The Turkish bullshit on this forum is horrendous...
It was you who was claiming that they came to "enforce" Enosis the other day.
Now it's "they came to resist the planned Turkish invasion".
What a joke!
What's wrong?
I stand corrected. I thought that was the whole purpose of debate and having an inquisitive mind for research.
Oracle did state this in another thread:I agree with you on virtually all these matters Paphitis; no contradictions with what I've read so far.
But I think the emphasis on Enosis, certainly after 1960, is distorted.
From what I can gather on the man, Grivas, I believe his main objective was to remove the inordinate amount of power the Brits and Turks mastered, into the 60's over the Island, and his only ally, in this simmering, continuous war, was Greece. This perpetual Enosis dream attributed to him, sounds like bad publicity spread by the enemies of Cyprus (Britain and Turkey).
Makes perfect sense to me.
There is no credible evidence whatsoever that proves the goal of ENOSIS was maintained post independence.
Let me give your inquisitive mind some help...Look up who was in the presidential seat at the time and have a look at a few of his RECORDED speeches.....Then get back to me........Enjoy!!!!