DT. wrote:YFred wrote:Paphitis wrote:DT. wrote:YFred wrote:You see I take issue with your figures. TC had 33% of the land. It has nothing to do with politics. The 18% was the population at 1963. These are the unreasonable demands from the GC side. You are being deliberately woolly to soot your side which in my book is unfair. Why should the turkish side accept less than 33% percent of the land, which they had in the past, and people like me did not object in the interst of all of Cyprus.
I disagree with your analysis. This time he who walks away will loose. Neither can afford to walk away. If it reaches a stalemate than its partition. Neither want that I hope, hence logic says that it will not get too stalemate. There will be an agreement. I believe DISY will back the agreement, will AKEL do the same. That is the biggest obstacle to peace.
Here we go!
Can you please show me how you know the TC's had 33% of the land?
He must of got it from Disnerland's Land Registry or Wikipedia....
You are very good at investigation, I am fairly sure you can do that yourself. But do not worry; it will all come out in the wash. The property issue is up for negotiations next week.
You've just posted a very controversial claim that the TC's owned 33% of the island. Could you please provide us with some evidence on this or should I continue in the same manner as yourself and claim that the Nazi's were really volunteer Turks rather than conscripted Germans?
Please read my post. It will all by on the negotiating table next week. Surely its not that long to wait? There are maps. These m maps will be put on the table. They will announce exactly how much we had and how much we are going to receive in an agreement situation.
What? are you saying that we only had 18%. Since when did 18% population=18% land.
The chance mathematically of that being true is billions to one and I am no statistician, just a guessing. Or should we be starting too teach you maths now. Your ancestors will turn in their graves with your ignorance.
Goodbye.