by Oracle » Thu Jan 08, 2009 2:32 pm
What you need to do, is find this alleged legislature, because to date this is opinion/conjecture/propaganda. Call it what you will ... but it is not evidence. What is more, there was no facilitation of any such legislature.
Your whole premise is based on what someone has said, initially passed on by you, via Michael Stephens. As we correctly pointed out to you.
So until you show us proof of such legislation, having been passed or even in practice, then these opinions remain baseless and unfounded.
If you look carefully at the articles, when evidence is presented, there is usually a reference to where the evidence exists.
This quote/claim has no REFERENCE!