Oracle wrote:doesntmatter wrote:Get Real! wrote:Truth wrote:How many times should I repeat:
I have quoted above from the following document:
House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee
Cyprus Second Report Volume II
Oral and written evidence
Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 1 February 2005
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmfaff/113/113ii.pdf And that document refers to UK House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee report of 2nd July 1987. This quotation does not contain a single word from Michael Stephens:
“Moreover in June 1967 the Greek Cypriot legislature unanimously passed a resolution in favour of ENOSIS, in blatant contravention of the 1960 Treaties and Constitution.”
House of Commons no. 23 of 1986-87. 2nd July 1987.
Page 239:
Written evidence submitted by Michael Stephen109
Why is Cyprus Divided?
Look, it's a well known fact that over the years some British MPs like Lord McGuiness, Michael Stevens, and others who were formerly in Cyprus (ex-military) and beaten by EOKA during the 1955..59 struggle, are bitter and have done everything they can to support Turkey but for every such person there's like 20 British politicians in support of GCs.
Even to this day, these people are still meddling… they’re now trying to build an unofficial 55..59 memorial in Kyrenia!.
Ahhhhh, now I get it...those Brits who are pro-GC are "credible" but those not are not, got you.
What is
not credible, is "Truth" trying to pass off someone's mere opinion as Evidence. In this case it happened to be Michael Stephen's who is not just biased anti-GC, but is a well known Turkish propagandist.
"Truth" continues to try and pass off this
opinion as something approved in Parliament and this fallacy has been pointed out to him at least 4 times on this thread.
"Truth" lied!
Oracle owes me £6.99.
Because...
I have made the following quotation from the UK House of Commons report on Cyprus dated 1 February 2005, from the evidence submitted by Michael Stephens. I said "This quotation does not contain a single word from Michael Stephens":
and Oracle said "What is
not credible, is "Truth" trying to pass off someone's mere opinion as Evidence." Oracle also said ""Truth" continues to try and pass off this
opinion as something approved in Parliament" and that I
lied.
Oracle owes me £6.99 because I have asked for a copy of the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee report on Cyprus 2 July 1987, from the House of Commons library, and they have charged me £6.99 to send this document:
You can download the entire document.
http://boxstr.com/files/4581351_adyoc/HCForeignAff1987Cyprus.zip 5MB
Page xiii, paragraph 31 of this document contains the quotation made by Michael Stephens, exactly as quoted by Michael Stephens.
Who is the liar here?
Michael Stephens, myself or Oracle?