Get Real! wrote:iceman wrote:I just realized i live on the moon..
I'm convinced... how much do you want for it?
Don't think there's much Green Cheese tough...
free_cyprus wrote:the zurich agreement was the biggest international laughing stock in history and in my eyes remains the same till this day unless we rip up the zurich agreement and start all over again
Tim Drayton wrote:halil wrote:Tim ,
I hope you can find the answer why they changed and why they feel to change their ideas ?
question yourself about AP and promises of the EU and others .
on your next trip to north try to talk with people what they felt after the referendum and asked them what they are feeling about next coming one.
properly it will be in autumn and let us to know . by judging old articles or sayings are nothing now . It is in past . Important what they are planning or what they are thinking now .
Halil, dostum, I am pretty sure in my own mind why they have changed, and it is not for the reasons you have stated.
There is a puppet regime in the north of Cyprus directly controlled by Turkey. The European Court of Human Rights recognises the situation as such and holds Turkey directly responsible for human rights abuses in that part of the island. When you consider that Turkey directly bankrolls the administration in the north to keep it afloat - you yourself were trumpeting a fresh loan granted by Turkey in another recent thread - it is not hard to understand the degree of leverage that Turkey has over that administration and those that hold office in it.
The simple truth is that there has been a shift in the balance of power in Turkey and, with it, a sharp change in Turkey's Cyprus policy. Talat, Soyer and other leading lights in the CTP have no choice but to eat their words and do as Turkey tells them.
Even so, it is astonishing to see the kind of things that Talat was saying only a few years ago. For example:
"Türkiye, bazı gericilerin anavatanı olabilir ve benim anavatanım değil." (19 December 1997-Kıbrıs Gazetesi)
[Turkey may be the motherland of certain backward people, but it is not my motherland]
"Türkiye'nin Kıbrıs'taki varlığı uluslararası hukuka aykırıdır." (19 September 2003-Vatan Gazetesi)
[Turkey's presence in Cyprus is contrary to international law.]
Oracle wrote:utu wrote:Oracle had commented that she doesn't want to see any Turkish flag flying in Cyprus, despite the constitutional right of Turkish Cypriots to do so (though I do wonder if any Turkish Cypriots living south of the Green Line actually do...). Her pic of a blue-yellow-white flag with Hellenic trappings shows her loyalties to be heavilly favored towards Greece.
Why should we be reminded of the presence of the ENEMY, because that is ALL the Turkish flag represents, and nothing more ... for the Cypriots.
But the flag I have resurrected, was the one used for the up-rising against the Ottoman-Turks in 1821, to regain freedom, a task clearly not yet complete in Cyprus, hence still valid.
Since it also has a yellow stripe, and olive branches, I think it even more suitable ...
denizaksulu wrote:....and the nightmare goes on.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest