Viewpoint wrote:Kifeas wrote:Viewpoint wrote:GCs are great at making threats and acting like the top dog but they never actually carry out their threats, why don't the veto Turkey or come out and swear at the Turkish military or make statements about the doom and gloom of how Turkey is going to collapse? GCs are all talk and no balls, really pathetic when you think about it, no one has come to the rescue of the GCs do they ever try to understand why? even the EU they out al their hopes on a magical EU solution 4 years and puff nothing zilch they didnt even get the ports opening up.
VP, let me once more re-explain to you what I have done so many times in the past. We have changed our mind and we will not veto Turkey. We will let her open and negotiate as many accession chapters as possible, and allow a good number of them to be completed, but without closing them. This means that after Turkey had done so much and most of the work towards its accession; we will freeze the closing of all the chapters and let her wait indefinitely at the door of the EU. In this way, Turkey will be faced with a very strong and critical dilemma. Should it give up and abandon the EU path as non feasible, after having done almost all the work needed towards accession; or should it take that extra step to come into its senses in relation to Cyprus, and make in this way full use of all the work and the effort that was spend towards accession.
Good idea, they will be so far advanced they may even tell the EU to go to helll or accept what will be the end result a special partnership to which you will have no say. Your leverage is not as strong as you priginally thought I have heard Erdoğan say many times we will just rename the EU criteria as the Ankara Criteria and go on our merry way.
We will have a full saying, even in the case of a special partnership.