In 1990 samples from 116 Turkish Cypriot, 303 Greek Cypriot, 235 mainland turks and 174 mainland greeks were tested in the US by professor Huisman.
Genetic illness and DNA expert Dr. Erol Baysal with the assistance of english, turkish, cypriot and greek experts conducted the work, and found that the Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot DNA was very close.
Even though the Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot see the mainland as there genetic source they are very far apart and also very different and that certain codes in the DNA which can only be found in cypriots was conclusive proof that Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot were the only ones that have this DNA.
Even though it was always assumed that Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot were close this showed they were much closer than could be anticipated.
Kıbrıs'ın tek bir devlet olduğu 1974 öncesi dönemde, adadaki soydaşlarımıza karşı korkunç saldırılar düzenlendiği, uzun vadeli bir soykırım yürütüldüğü herkesin bildiği bir gerçektir.
Bananiot wrote:On the contrary, us Cypriots want to press on to the major bigots such as yourself, that we do not need to be associated with mother countried because there is no fundamental basis for such an association and with political terms, this stupidity has already cost us a great deal.
Bananiot wrote:You seem to forget how this debate started. Let me remind you:In 1990 samples from 116 Turkish Cypriot, 303 Greek Cypriot, 235 mainland turks and 174 mainland greeks were tested in the US by professor Huisman.
Genetic illness and DNA expert Dr. Erol Baysal with the assistance of english, turkish, cypriot and greek experts conducted the work, and found that the Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot DNA was very close.
Even though the Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot see the mainland as there genetic source they are very far apart and also very different and that certain codes in the DNA which can only be found in cypriots was conclusive proof that Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot were the only ones that have this DNA.
Even though it was always assumed that Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot were close this showed they were much closer than could be anticipated.
I have no doubt that the original poster had something different in mind to your interpretations that knocked the intended purpose of the poster off road.
Why do you think the above was posted?
Of course it is nonsense to argue for the existence of a "Cypriot race" based on genetic evidence.
If you examine the discourse promoted by Denktash and those that think like him, it is rooted in arguments of a genetic nature. The Turkish word "soydaş" ["soy" lineage + the suffix "daş" indicated something shared = 'one of shared lineage'] is constantly employed to support their arguments. Just to quote one example found at random:
It is a truth known to everyone that prior to 1974 when Cyprus was a single state that horrific attacks were conducted and long-term genocide was practiced against our "soydaş" [fellow kinsmen, blood brothers] on the island.
In other words, the 1974 invasion is justified in terms of kinship.
If the argument that Turkey is entitled and duty bound to intervene in Cyprus is premised on a putative genetic bond, then surely it is quite legitimate for opponents of this thesis to exploit any available genetic evidence that destroys this premise.
BirKibrisli wrote: We are talking about the GCs and TCs having the same gene pool,which is different to their respective "motherlands"...
Bananiot wrote:Poor Birkibrisli, I feel for you and I will stand by your side and fight the bigots till death. Not as Cypriots but as human beings.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest