So, Zan, the EU does exist for you! Good!
The next question is, does the RoC, as it is recognised by the UN and the EU, exist for you, "yes" or "no?"
Kifeas wrote:So, Zan, the EU does exist for you! Good!
The next question is, does the RoC, as it is recognised by the UN and the EU, exist for you, "yes" or "no?"
zan wrote:Now a question for you....
In 1962/63, did the constitution of the CYPRUS REPUBLIC exist and did the veto of the TCs exist?????? Why did Makarios and the GCs ignore them???
Get Real! wrote:zan wrote:Now a question for you....
In 1962/63, did the constitution of the CYPRUS REPUBLIC exist and did the veto of the TCs exist?????? Why did Makarios and the GCs ignore them???
Objection your honor... that's two questions!
zan wrote:Get Real! wrote:zan wrote:Now a question for you....
In 1962/63, did the constitution of the CYPRUS REPUBLIC exist and did the veto of the TCs exist?????? Why did Makarios and the GCs ignore them???
Objection your honor... that's two questions!
How did I know that would happen
Did you see my comments on the seminar GR???
zan wrote:Kifeas wrote:So, Zan, the EU does exist for you! Good!
The next question is, does the RoC, as it is recognised by the UN and the EU, exist for you, "yes" or "no?"
No.......
Nor does the first sentence of your post above.......You were not in the EU when the TRNC was formed so it is a nonsense......The EU encroached on TRNC soil would be more accurate.
Now a question for you....
In 1962/63, did the constitution of the CYPRUS REPUBLIC exist and did the veto of the TCs exist?????? Why did Makarios and the GCs ignore them???
Kifeas wrote:Is this Talat man for real, or has he lost the plot completely?
He went to Brussels pretending to be a “president” of a (non-EU member) separate “state” in Cyprus, the “TRNC,” one that was (illegally) “established” on the soil of another (EU member) state, which he does not recognize –set aside its EU membership- and said to Barroso, the president of the EU Commission that: (a.) the TCs must have “equal treatment” and separate participation in the EU parliament by taking 2 out of the 6 seats allocated to the RoC, and (b.) that the Turkish Cypriots “do not want the mediation of the EU which had lost neutrality due to the memberships of the Greek Cypriot administration and Greece…”
Such a defective logic and such a ridiculous way of behaving, I have never seen in my life!
Either the man does not recognize the existence of the EU and /or Cyprus’s membership to it, due to the fact that he does not recognize the existence of the RoC (he only recognizes a “GC administration” in the south,) in which case the question is: on what platform and for what reason has he visited Brussels and met with Barroso in the first place; or he does indeed recognize both the EU and the RoC, as well as its (RoC) membership in it (EU,) in which case the question becomes: on what platform has he asked Barroso to grand to a separate (non EU member) “state,” the “TRNC,” two (2) out of the six (6) seats in the EU parliament that were allocated to another (EU member) state, the RoC.
Honestly, it is unbelievably absurd!
http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/english/worl ... sp?gid=244
Kifeas wrote:zan wrote:Kifeas wrote:So, Zan, the EU does exist for you! Good!
The next question is, does the RoC, as it is recognised by the UN and the EU, exist for you, "yes" or "no?"
No.......
Nor does the first sentence of your post above.......You were not in the EU when the TRNC was formed so it is a nonsense......The EU encroached on TRNC soil would be more accurate.
Now a question for you....
In 1962/63, did the constitution of the CYPRUS REPUBLIC exist and did the veto of the TCs exist?????? Why did Makarios and the GCs ignore them???
So, Zan, you are saying that neither the EU exist, nor the RoC. Is that right?
Viewpoint wrote:You are the one out of touch why shouldnt he ask to be treated equally with GCs? taking the 2 seats is a way of allowing us a voice and not just GC, continue with the current set up means they only hear one side of the story, that makes them biased.
Get Real! wrote:Viewpoint wrote:You are the one out of touch why shouldnt he ask to be treated equally with GCs? taking the 2 seats is a way of allowing us a voice and not just GC, continue with the current set up means they only hear one side of the story, that makes them biased.
The EU Commission is not a court.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests