Kikapu wrote:BirKibrisli wrote:Again I return to my couple analogy,because one of the partners have used the assets left behind and managed to build a nice home,and managed to join a club with a lot of benefits,how realistic is it to expect the estranged partner to return "home",before the remaining partner shows remorse and agrees to go to anger management or couple therapy???? True democracy,human rights,international law etc sounds great,but it will not get the TCs and Turkey to sign on the dotted line...So obviously a compromise interim solution is needed...Knowing this,and insisting on True Federation,as you put it,is it not as questionable as Talat's ( and Turkey's) recent proposals?
Well, I have already given you two answers on your "Husband & Wife" analogy as to why it is not a good example for what we have in Cyprus. But I want to hear what is your "interim" compromise for a settlement. Just how many Cypriots rights do you intend violating just to get the TCs to sign up.? Do any of these rights violations also include the TCs or is it only for the GCs.? How do you plan to convince the EU to go along with the violations of their own principles in order to violate the rights of many Cypriots.? What is it in for the GCs to have their rights violated just to please the TCs.? They didn't like it in 1960, so why would they want it today
when they have a complete control of the RoC legally, politically and economically, not to mentions yesterday's Orams case results. Can you give me one good reason why they would do all that, just to please the TCs (Turkey) when in fact any attempt like that gives them no guarantee of a better future, even if they did get some land back. I have given you my BBF power sharing proposals which is very balanced for both sides, which is where we TCs need to start thinking of achieving with the GCs. It will be a win-.win for everyone if a genuine unification is what we all want. If not, than it is a bad plan, as VP told me so, because it does not give the north to be pure TC (Turkey) and also does not allow partition at will. Now, you tell me who doesn't want to unify and who does between the GCs and the TCs.!
Whatever you think of my couple analogy,you need to respond to the key aspect of it,Kikapu...That is: there has been physical and emotional trauma in this relationship before...Do you really think we can just sweep it under the carpet,and move onto another relationship,whatever that is,and hope to make it a success...I think (from memory) you implied earlier that that marriage was forced,and that was the reason for troubles.
But if we ignore the TC red lines today,the new marriage would be a forced one too...I see what you saying though...We have no chance of solving those problems,healing those traumas,so best to forget about them and move on...And hope for the best...This is the crunch point...The TCs have experienced something they had totally forgotten about...They experineced physical security....They do not go to bed and wonder whether they would be waking up in the morning,as it was the case between 63-74...I would be delighted if they moved on on mass...But it is not realistic Kikapu..It is wishful thinking on your part...They have not had your and my experiences,living in the trnc...They need to retain some of that security,at least intially....
Talking about violations of GC rights...What do you think is happening in Cyprus as we speak? How easy it is for people to forget that there were 2 partners in the RoC Republic and one has been missing for since 1963...Where are our rights accorded under the 1960 agreements...do you also think the TCs simply walked away to advance the Partition cause of Denktas...??? You say the GCs have total control of the RoC legally...That has been the GC argument for ages...Do you as a TC believe that?? You see nothing wrong with the way the TCs lost their share of power in the RoC? do you also think it was all their fault??? Does any moral arguments come in here???
I do not have my own proposals for a solution,Kikapu...And as I said many times I have no trouble living with your proposals...But it is obvious now,the TCs will not accept any solutiion which will remove Turkey out of the picture from the beginning...The agreement will have to accomodate this,or there will be no agreement...I have one good reason why the GCs should accept a compromise on this,if they don't they will loose 36 % of Cyprus to Turkey...But they will have one consolation,the TCs will lose 100% of Cyprus...Reading cetain Forumers' comments here, that might just be enough incentive for the GCs to insist on not compromising on their recently found democratic and human rights principles...