The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


The Cyprus Problem for Dummies .....

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Viewpoint » Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:48 pm

Pyrpolizer wrote:VP you are not reading carefully. Read all of Kikapu's solution proposals, and you will find out.

The only difference between Kikapu and others is that he doesn't excuse everything based on the events of the 60's. You know very well how Kikapu was affected perhaps much more than the average TC was.


I have read it with interest and search for just one point where he supports or even defends the TC stance or runs the Gcs down like he does the TCs, he is biased and has a warped and very sick viewpoint on matters, in his eyes the TCs are wrong and the GCs are right end of story.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Pyrpolizer » Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:54 pm

BirKibrisli wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:Top class discussion here between Kikapu and Birkibrisli.
Excellent points from two different angles of view.

The only thing I would like to add is that every Cypriot is a different personality. Some people see the wrong doings of the other side only, understand their own suffering only, don’t care and don’t want to hear or understand anything that concerns the other side. Some people are just Turk or Greek haters. Their own side are Angels the other side are all Evil.
Some other people can extend their understanding and empathy to the other side. And some others chose to side with what their own side calls the "enemy". Expecting the majority of the people to develop empathy for the other community as a necessary pre-requisite for a solution like my friend Bir said, is a noble expectation but is against human nature.
My friend kikapu said this can only happen after a fair solution, but I don’t think that will happen either,even if the solution is fair for all. The percentages may increase, but the majority will still not have any empathy for the past sufferings for the other community.Simply because they never had first hand experience.
What I think will happen is that the majority from both sides will put the past behind, and start building bridges, empathy and understanding from there on.

That much for human nature. Expecting too much from the people will just make you crazy.
On the other hand here we have the concept of what the majority of the people think or want at a given time.
Imo anyone who will try to discover a way to make the majority think in a certain way will just end up crazy again. These things are completely uncontrollable. They change with the wind. Once upon a time 96% of the GCs wanted Enosis. Slowly slowly that changed. And it did not change because of the Turkish invasion it changed long before that when the Gcs discovered they can do much better economically than Greece. Money is honey you know…
Bir said VP represents the majority of TCs because the majority of them today want partition. Well so be it, however the majority of TCs in 2003-4 wanted unification no matter what.Imo if Christofias and Talat come to an agreement before April that will get at least 80% of the TC and GC vote. So where does that put VP? (to be honest I think VP will then be in that 80% forgetting about her partitionist friends)

Coming to the essense of my friends’ discussion which as I understood has to do with the red lines of each community: Imo each side has to take reasonable risks if a solution would ever be reached. Surely a confederation is not going to be accepted by GCs. Imo the TCs must take the reasonable risk of a strong Federation as exists in other countries. The risk here is that maybe the GCs will return en masse and spoil the very concept of bizonality and slowly slowly absorb the TCs. It’s an risk I know, but a reasonable one because the chance of this ever happening is very low.Very few GCs will ever chose to go back living lonely among TCs. Perhaps the risk taken by the TCs could be countered with another risk by the GCs by accepting quotas. The reasonable element in this risk for the GCs is that most propably the quota will never be reached.

Same goes for Turkey’s guarantees. It seems these are absolutely necessary for the TCs feeling of safety. If me as a GC would know those guarantees are not going to be used unilaterally to start a new war, and their mandate was within Nato, or together with some EU force, I could take the risk of accepting them for a limited period.(Certainly not for ever and certainly not until Turkey joins the EU). Countering the risk taken by the GCs, the TCs should also take the risk of the Turkish Guarantees not be purely Turkish but with some other accepted military power.

I am really incapable of understanding the fears of the TCs joining the GCs in a United Federal Cyprus in a strong federation. If the situation was the reverse and the TCs were in the EU already, with higher standard of living, and much better economy, me as a GC would risk my joining them without second thought, given the fact they already accepted my ruling the internal affairs of my Fed state, and the political equality of the Fed parts. I believe this risk has already been accepted by the TCs, and that those who now prefer partition are just skeptics, waiting to see if the final agreement is worthy enough.


Hello,dear PYRO...I was thinking about you the other day....I missed your logical,sensible,and compassionate approach to our Problem...I hope all is well with you and your loved ones...

As you so rightly point out,if there will be a solution it will be based on a compromise....both sides will have to dig deep and find some point in their red lines where they can give and take... The majority of the TCs lean towards Partition because they have deep suspicions of the GC motives...This is based on their past experiences and not,as certain people keep harping on,because they want Turkey to gain anything over GC's loss...When this point is truly appreciated by the GCs,I am sure the TCs will accept a Strong Federation,as long as their political supremecy and physical security are guaranteed,to their satisfaction...I know the GCs also have deep fears about the TC motivations...The fundamental probably beeing an intension to have Enosis with Turkey down the line...

Knowing the TC mentality I would say that is not a real possibility,especially after their experiences with the settlers over the past 30 years...The fact is,without a solution Partition or annexation by Turkey is a near certainty...It is one risk the GCs will have to take,otherwise what they fear will happen anyway....I hope I am making sense...

And please don't disappear again,dear compatriot...We need your calming influence and logical analysis more than ever on this Forum... :wink: :)


Hello my friend Bir, I already promised that i will be here 24/7 if we have good developments in April. In the meantime most probably i will just be watching. But hey, I might also pop in with a birthday cake for you in mid February. :wink: :lol:
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby Kikapu » Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:04 am

Pyrpolizer wrote:VP you are not reading carefully. Read all of Kikapu's solution proposals, and you will find out.

The only difference between Kikapu and others is that he doesn't excuse everything based on the events of the 60's. You know very well how Kikapu was affected perhaps much more than the average TC was.


Actually Pyro, VP made a lot of contribution to my thread on the BBF plan, which I thank him for, because it gave me all the opportunities to cover all his concerns, which I did, but from the beginning he has refused it because the plan did not allow for partition and VP likes to keep that option open, so that next time when there is another constitutional crises like in 1963, the TCs will be able to walk out of the government and declare independence as a Confederate state, and Bingo, you will have a recognised state and also in the EU. Turkey's and NeoPartitionist's dream come true.!
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby Pyrpolizer » Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:04 am

Viewpoint wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:VP you are not reading carefully. Read all of Kikapu's solution proposals, and you will find out.

The only difference between Kikapu and others is that he doesn't excuse everything based on the events of the 60's. You know very well how Kikapu was affected perhaps much more than the average TC was.


I have read it with interest and search for just one point where he supports or even defends the TC stance or runs the Gcs down like he does the TCs, he is biased and has a warped and very sick viewpoint on matters, in his eyes the TCs are wrong and the GCs are right end of story.


I don't agree.His solution proposals on many points go against his own principles (read his previous post as to which they are) in order to satisfy the TC wants. On the other hand a person who wears a "biting shark" type of TURKISH flag like you, should not complain that Kikapu is not advocating the TC stance. :wink:

Furthermore If you analyze the effects of the Cyprob on the two communities from the 60s until today you will discover that the TCs were always the bigest losers of the game. The Gcs were also losing but the TCs were always losing much more. It's like the chess game that Kikapu talked about. The one who loses more loses everything in the end...In one of his recent responses he told you this

wrote: "Turkey will decide on the north and not you when the time comes to choose between the north or the EU. My bet is, she will choose the EU…


Instead of taking his response as a warning for the TC side that may result on them losing it all, you took it as if Kikapu is supporting the GCs!
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby BirKibrisli » Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:52 am

boulio wrote:
My father took his shotgun and all the ammunition he could find,but left me with one handgranade...He took me aside and gave me his final instructions...If the GC fighters came to the door before he got back,I was to gather my mother and sisters around me and pull the pin...He made me promise I would do it...I was 12 years old GR!...what were you doing for light entertainment ,at home,at that age????


at least you had a habdgrenade to pull a pin and save yourselfs,what about all those girls raped and killed by the turkish army?whish they had a grenade to save themselves :wink:


Thanks,bulio,for your empathy and compassion for that particular 12 year old and his predicament...Your attitude sums up why we can never live together again as one people one nation...The best we can hope for is some loose federation where people with mentality such as yours cannot hurt each other any longer... :( :(
User avatar
BirKibrisli
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Australia

Postby BirKibrisli » Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:18 am

Pyrpolizer wrote:
BirKibrisli wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:Top class discussion here between Kikapu and Birkibrisli.
Excellent points from two different angles of view.

The only thing I would like to add is that every Cypriot is a different personality. Some people see the wrong doings of the other side only, understand their own suffering only, don’t care and don’t want to hear or understand anything that concerns the other side. Some people are just Turk or Greek haters. Their own side are Angels the other side are all Evil.
Some other people can extend their understanding and empathy to the other side. And some others chose to side with what their own side calls the "enemy". Expecting the majority of the people to develop empathy for the other community as a necessary pre-requisite for a solution like my friend Bir said, is a noble expectation but is against human nature.
My friend kikapu said this can only happen after a fair solution, but I don’t think that will happen either,even if the solution is fair for all. The percentages may increase, but the majority will still not have any empathy for the past sufferings for the other community.Simply because they never had first hand experience.
What I think will happen is that the majority from both sides will put the past behind, and start building bridges, empathy and understanding from there on.

That much for human nature. Expecting too much from the people will just make you crazy.
On the other hand here we have the concept of what the majority of the people think or want at a given time.
Imo anyone who will try to discover a way to make the majority think in a certain way will just end up crazy again. These things are completely uncontrollable. They change with the wind. Once upon a time 96% of the GCs wanted Enosis. Slowly slowly that changed. And it did not change because of the Turkish invasion it changed long before that when the Gcs discovered they can do much better economically than Greece. Money is honey you know…
Bir said VP represents the majority of TCs because the majority of them today want partition. Well so be it, however the majority of TCs in 2003-4 wanted unification no matter what.Imo if Christofias and Talat come to an agreement before April that will get at least 80% of the TC and GC vote. So where does that put VP? (to be honest I think VP will then be in that 80% forgetting about her partitionist friends)

Coming to the essense of my friends’ discussion which as I understood has to do with the red lines of each community: Imo each side has to take reasonable risks if a solution would ever be reached. Surely a confederation is not going to be accepted by GCs. Imo the TCs must take the reasonable risk of a strong Federation as exists in other countries. The risk here is that maybe the GCs will return en masse and spoil the very concept of bizonality and slowly slowly absorb the TCs. It’s an risk I know, but a reasonable one because the chance of this ever happening is very low.Very few GCs will ever chose to go back living lonely among TCs. Perhaps the risk taken by the TCs could be countered with another risk by the GCs by accepting quotas. The reasonable element in this risk for the GCs is that most propably the quota will never be reached.

Same goes for Turkey’s guarantees. It seems these are absolutely necessary for the TCs feeling of safety. If me as a GC would know those guarantees are not going to be used unilaterally to start a new war, and their mandate was within Nato, or together with some EU force, I could take the risk of accepting them for a limited period.(Certainly not for ever and certainly not until Turkey joins the EU). Countering the risk taken by the GCs, the TCs should also take the risk of the Turkish Guarantees not be purely Turkish but with some other accepted military power.

I am really incapable of understanding the fears of the TCs joining the GCs in a United Federal Cyprus in a strong federation. If the situation was the reverse and the TCs were in the EU already, with higher standard of living, and much better economy, me as a GC would risk my joining them without second thought, given the fact they already accepted my ruling the internal affairs of my Fed state, and the political equality of the Fed parts. I believe this risk has already been accepted by the TCs, and that those who now prefer partition are just skeptics, waiting to see if the final agreement is worthy enough.


Hello,dear PYRO...I was thinking about you the other day....I missed your logical,sensible,and compassionate approach to our Problem...I hope all is well with you and your loved ones...

As you so rightly point out,if there will be a solution it will be based on a compromise....both sides will have to dig deep and find some point in their red lines where they can give and take... The majority of the TCs lean towards Partition because they have deep suspicions of the GC motives...This is based on their past experiences and not,as certain people keep harping on,because they want Turkey to gain anything over GC's loss...When this point is truly appreciated by the GCs,I am sure the TCs will accept a Strong Federation,as long as their political supremecy and physical security are guaranteed,to their satisfaction...I know the GCs also have deep fears about the TC motivations...The fundamental probably beeing an intension to have Enosis with Turkey down the line...

Knowing the TC mentality I would say that is not a real possibility,especially after their experiences with the settlers over the past 30 years...The fact is,without a solution Partition or annexation by Turkey is a near certainty...It is one risk the GCs will have to take,otherwise what they fear will happen anyway....I hope I am making sense...

And please don't disappear again,dear compatriot...We need your calming influence and logical analysis more than ever on this Forum... :wink: :)


Hello my friend Bir, I already promised that i will be here 24/7 if we have good developments in April. In the meantime most probably i will just be watching. But hey, I might also pop in with a birthday cake for you in mid February. :wink: :lol:


Watching,I guess is better than simply going away...But when the cat is away mice start playing,as you can see... :wink:
Looking forward to more posts from you,dear Pyro,and...for the birthday cake in February!!! :)
User avatar
BirKibrisli
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Australia

Postby BirKibrisli » Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:21 am

Kikapu wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:VP you are not reading carefully. Read all of Kikapu's solution proposals, and you will find out.

The only difference between Kikapu and others is that he doesn't excuse everything based on the events of the 60's. You know very well how Kikapu was affected perhaps much more than the average TC was.


Actually Pyro, VP made a lot of contribution to my thread on the BBF plan, which I thank him for, because it gave me all the opportunities to cover all his concerns, which I did, but from the beginning he has refused it because the plan did not allow for partition and VP likes to keep that option open, so that next time when there is another constitutional crises like in 1963, the TCs will be able to walk out of the government and declare independence as a Confederate state, and Bingo, you will have a recognised state and also in the EU. Turkey's and NeoPartitionist's dream come true.!


Yee of little Faith!!! :wink:
User avatar
BirKibrisli
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Australia

Postby YFred » Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:25 am

BirKibrisli wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:VP you are not reading carefully. Read all of Kikapu's solution proposals, and you will find out.

The only difference between Kikapu and others is that he doesn't excuse everything based on the events of the 60's. You know very well how Kikapu was affected perhaps much more than the average TC was.


Actually Pyro, VP made a lot of contribution to my thread on the BBF plan, which I thank him for, because it gave me all the opportunities to cover all his concerns, which I did, but from the beginning he has refused it because the plan did not allow for partition and VP likes to keep that option open, so that next time when there is another constitutional crises like in 1963, the TCs will be able to walk out of the government and declare independence as a Confederate state, and Bingo, you will have a recognised state and also in the EU. Turkey's and NeoPartitionist's dream come true.!


Yee of little Faith!!! :wink:

One day soon I am going to read that blasted BBF plan but only as a last resort and if I have nothing else to read.
Now, that's unlikely.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Expatkiwi » Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:27 am

YFred wrote:One day soon I am going to read that blasted BBF plan but only as a last resort and if I have nothing else to read.
Now, that's unlikely.


What kind of plan do you prefer? Or what variances on the options available would you prefer, if you had to choose?
User avatar
Expatkiwi
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: Texas, USA

Postby YFred » Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:31 am

Expatkiwi wrote:
YFred wrote:One day soon I am going to read that blasted BBF plan but only as a last resort and if I have nothing else to read.
Now, that's unlikely.


What kind of plan do you prefer? Or what variances on the options available would you prefer, if you had to choose?

For me there is only one plan. The one that Talat is negotiating right now. Anything else is pissing in the wind. Total waste of time. As to Kikapoo's plan, it stinks to high heaven or kingdom come or what ever you like.
Can you really take Kick baby's plan seriously and discuss it? Have you guys got nothing better to do in life.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests