Floda wrote:Cem wrote:Free Spirit wrote:Get Real! wrote:In line with many others, I have invented my own definition for the word “terrorism”…
It’s the act of abusing the word “terrorism”!...because those that do to conceal THEIR crimes terrorize me the most!
OK so in your opinion the recent activities in Mumbai is not terrorism; so maybe you will now explain just what you would call murdering nearly 200 people; only this time without the claptrap about the "wicked evil west". and then go and tell the family of your fellow Cypriot who was murdered there that it was perfectly legitimate.
I'd just love to be a fly on the wall in the room when you told them that his murder was perfectly justifiable;[color=red]
I don't think that you will be very popular anywhere in Cyprus, [b]in fact if I were you I'd be keeping a low profile and your mouth shut.
Don't expect him to do the impossible with his recurrent "oral diarrhea".
I think that both the above comments (in condemnation of Get Real's) are unfair since they do not address the issue mentioned nor indicate understanding of what is written.
Yes, it doesn’t seem like they grasped what I said but it doesn’t surprise me as one is a Zionist supporter and the other a G.Bush fan!
With regards to the Mumbai events, its easy to blame it on “Muslims” or “Arabs” or “terrorists” or “aliens” even, when it serves your interests or are unable to see the bigger picture.
An approach I tend to use is to try and understand who would benefit from these incidents in order to figure out who might be behind it.
The incidents have achieved to…
1. Severely affect India’s tourism.
2. Reignite the “global terrorism” risk.
3. Bring India and Pakistan closer to war.
4. Have Israel barking due to 9 victims being Israeli.
Now if you can figure out who would benefit from the above you’ve got your culprit…