Cyprus-Forum.com

[humanist]

if talat spent more time on goodwill gestures less time on bitching about RoC legitimate business may be he would be vice President by now

[Kifeas]

So in short you do not accept a virgin birth approach as a solution but demand that the continuation of the "RoC"? Was it not the GCs who wanted to change the 1960 constitution eg Akritas? they believed that the agreements signed by them in 1960 gave TCs to many rights and therefore had to change, will you accept that we go back to those exact same agreements where we have veto rights and Turkey has intervention rights or how long will it take before you cry wolf with a revised Akritas 2???

VP, in case you do not realize it, what a bizonal bicommunal federation entails –more so the way your side understands or wants it, is far worse and difficult for the GC side to live with, than what the 1960 RoC constitution provided. In case you do not realize it, it is you that now has the biggest problem with the 1960 constitutional setup, and as far as the GC side is concerned, it would have no problem returning back to it in full.

Why don't your leaders put this on the table? I still feel the GCs will never accept sharing power whether it be a return to the current constitution which they would try to change immediately or a new arrangement via a BBF, they still have not gotten their heads around the idea of sharing anything with TCs other than throwing them a few morsels of you can be a minority in a GC state run by GCs.

What you are saying amounts to nothing more than empty talk we already heard a million times before! In all our proposals, we have proved that sharing power -provided is made in the right way and proportions- is not our biggest problem!

[Viewpoint]

So in short you do not accept a virgin birth approach as a solution but demand that the continuation of the "RoC"? Was it not the GCs who wanted to change the 1960 constitution eg Akritas? they believed that the agreements signed by them in 1960 gave TCs to many rights and therefore had to change, will you accept that we go back to those exact same agreements where we have veto rights and Turkey has intervention rights or how long will it take before you cry wolf with a revised Akritas 2???

VP, in case you do not realize it, what a bizonal bicommunal federation entails –more so the way your side understands or wants it, is far worse and difficult for the GC side to live with, than what the 1960 RoC constitution provided. In case you do not realize it, it is you that now has the biggest problem with the 1960 constitutional setup, and as far as the GC side is concerned, it would have no problem returning back to it in full.

Why don't your leaders put this on the table? I still feel the GCs will never accept sharing power whether it be a return to the current constitution which they would try to change immediately or a new arrangement via a BBF, they still have not gotten their heads around the idea of sharing anything with TCs other than throwing them a few morsels of you can be a minority in a GC state run by GCs.

What you are saying amounts to nothing more than empty talk we already heard a million times before! In all our proposals, we have proved that sharing power -provided is made in the right way and proportions- is not our biggest problem!

The right way being the GC way anything else will be rejected.

[humanist]

good to see you finally got it VP

[Viewpoint]

Thats not how it works humanist and is the reason why you will never find a solution.