Nikitas wrote:Filitsa my dear,
I was a business lawyer for some years, a major part of them working for a major, and I mean MAJOR US company. Tax law was part of my daily routine. We had ofices in every country in Africa and the Middle East. Along with registered offices in Delaware (the tax haven of the USA).
Double taxation laws are a matter of course between nations, ie Cyprus and the USA have agreements that they will not tax their nationals who have alread been taxed in each other's jurisdictions.
So a company registered in Cyprus, doing its business outside of Cyprus will pay 10 per cent corporate tax. This payment precludes it from being taxed in the USA. However, it does not help if the company has premises and business dealings inside the USA.
But, what you do not apparently get, is that after that initial corporate tax the income derived by the shareholders will be taxed at regular Cyprus PERSONAL income tax rates which reach the same levels (give or take a few points) as USA tax. It is not allowed to keep undistributed profits longer than two years and so evade personal tax in Cyprus. At two years after registration the company owners will pay 37 per cent total tax which is comparable to the USA. There goes the tax haven idea!
Cyprus companies must have fully identified persons (legal or natural) as shareholders with fully legalised and apostiled identity documentation, ie there are no "straw man" loopholes, therefore no ways to launder money. There goes the laundering charge.
Can you say the same for US registered companies in places like Delaware and Nevada?
As for the Milosevic money, there was transportation of money, not laundering in the sense that is used in US law, ie turning dirty money into legally useable funds and thus avoid the charge of "invisible means of support". Del Ponte determined that cash was moved by Serbian personnel in their planes, at the request of their central bank. Why did she not issue an indictment against ANYONE regarding these "revelations"? Possibly because there was no crime involved?
Nikitas, again, I am not disputing the the legal agreements.
Was it within Del Ponte's jurisdiction to issue such indictments?