Cyprus-Forum.com

[Oracle]

... The list has nothing to do with how people see themselves and everything to do with how they come across to GR ....

You are going back on your word ...

2. If you feel you’ve been “wronged” with your current classification do tell.

[Get Real!]

Some people are complaining about their classification…

The list has nothing to do with how people see themselves and everything to do with how they come across to GR based on all their input thus far (that I have read and recall).

For example, you may feel inside you that you’re a “Hungarian-Anarchist” but if you’ve spent the last year or so mostly pushing for a Palestinian state then you’d fall under the “Pro-Palestinian” group and not under the “Hungarian-Anarchists”.

It’s basically the impression you have made on me based on what you’ve been pushing and the intensity of that and it’s not necessarily how the rest of the members see you. Please don’t take it too seriously because it’s only done for fun and it’s only MY opinion.

Regards, GR.

Ok then, in the spirit of the GR judgement please explain to me what a floater is. If you're going to bother making such a post then make sure we simpletons understand whats going on in your head.

It’s not a “floater” unless you’re talking about toilets! The actual phrase is an indivisible “floating voter” which technically refers to a non party-affiliated person who is undecided and forms part of the “swing” in an election result.

The borrowed “floating voter” as used here is that member who leans towards the “Let’s wait and see” view without being hampered by fixated standpoints. These people are more negotiable than others and exhibit a greater level of impartiality so I’d say it’s quite admirable to be one.

[Get Real!]

... The list has nothing to do with how people see themselves and everything to do with how they come across to GR ....

You are going back on your word ...

2. If you feel you’ve been “wronged” with your current classification do tell.

Why do you think the word "wronged" was in inverted commas? Because the thread title ends with a "...according to GR" , ...but its always interesting to hear people's arguments.

[denizaksulu]

Some people are complaining about their classification…

The list has nothing to do with how people see themselves and everything to do with how they come across to GR based on all their input thus far (that I have read and recall).

For example, you may feel inside you that you’re a “Hungarian-Anarchist” but if you’ve spent the last year or so mostly pushing for a Palestinian state then you’d fall under the “Pro-Palestinian” group and not under the “Hungarian-Anarchists”.

It’s basically the impression you have made on me based on what you’ve been pushing and the intensity of that and it’s not necessarily how the rest of the members see you. Please don’t take it too seriously because it’s only done for fun and it’s only MY opinion.

Regards, GR.

Ok then, in the spirit of the GR judgement please explain to me what a floater is. If you're going to bother making such a post then make sure we simpletons understand whats going on in your head.

For that to be answered, he needs to know it himself.

[Get Real!]

For that to be answered, he needs to know it himself.

I know it's floating upstairs somewhere...

[DT.]

Some people are complaining about their classification…

The list has nothing to do with how people see themselves and everything to do with how they come across to GR based on all their input thus far (that I have read and recall).

For example, you may feel inside you that you’re a “Hungarian-Anarchist” but if you’ve spent the last year or so mostly pushing for a Palestinian state then you’d fall under the “Pro-Palestinian” group and not under the “Hungarian-Anarchists”.

It’s basically the impression you have made on me based on what you’ve been pushing and the intensity of that and it’s not necessarily how the rest of the members see you. Please don’t take it too seriously because it’s only done for fun and it’s only MY opinion.

Regards, GR.

Ok then, in the spirit of the GR judgement please explain to me what a floater is. If you're going to bother making such a post then make sure we simpletons understand whats going on in your head.

It’s not a “floater” unless you’re talking about toilets! The actual phrase is an indivisible “floating voter” which technically refers to a non party-affiliated person who is undecided and forms part of the “swing” in an election result.

The borrowed “floating voter” as used here is that member who leans towards the “Let’s wait and see” view without being hampered by fixated standpoints. These people are more negotiable than others and exhibit a greater level of impartiality so I’d say it’s quite admirable to be one.

I have decided to accept your response.

[Get Real!]

Some people are complaining about their classification…

The list has nothing to do with how people see themselves and everything to do with how they come across to GR based on all their input thus far (that I have read and recall).

For example, you may feel inside you that you’re a “Hungarian-Anarchist” but if you’ve spent the last year or so mostly pushing for a Palestinian state then you’d fall under the “Pro-Palestinian” group and not under the “Hungarian-Anarchists”.

It’s basically the impression you have made on me based on what you’ve been pushing and the intensity of that and it’s not necessarily how the rest of the members see you. Please don’t take it too seriously because it’s only done for fun and it’s only MY opinion.

Regards, GR.

Ok then, in the spirit of the GR judgement please explain to me what a floater is. If you're going to bother making such a post then make sure we simpletons understand whats going on in your head.

It’s not a “floater” unless you’re talking about toilets! The actual phrase is an indivisible “floating voter” which technically refers to a non party-affiliated person who is undecided and forms part of the “swing” in an election result.

The borrowed “floating voter” as used here is that member who leans towards the “Let’s wait and see” view without being hampered by fixated standpoints. These people are more negotiable than others and exhibit a greater level of impartiality so I’d say it’s quite admirable to be one.

I have decided to accept your response.

An admirable decision...

[denizaksulu]

Some people are complaining about their classification…

The list has nothing to do with how people see themselves and everything to do with how they come across to GR based on all their input thus far (that I have read and recall).

For example, you may feel inside you that you’re a “Hungarian-Anarchist” but if you’ve spent the last year or so mostly pushing for a Palestinian state then you’d fall under the “Pro-Palestinian” group and not under the “Hungarian-Anarchists”.

It’s basically the impression you have made on me based on what you’ve been pushing and the intensity of that and it’s not necessarily how the rest of the members see you. Please don’t take it too seriously because it’s only done for fun and it’s only MY opinion.

Regards, GR.

Ok then, in the spirit of the GR judgement please explain to me what a floater is. If you're going to bother making such a post then make sure we simpletons understand whats going on in your head.

It’s not a “floater” unless you’re talking about toilets! The actual phrase is an indivisible “floating voter” which technically refers to a non party-affiliated person who is undecided and forms part of the “swing” in an election result.

The borrowed “floating voter” as used here is that member who leans towards the “Let’s wait and see” view without being hampered by fixated standpoints. These people are more negotiable than others and exhibit a greater level of impartiality so I’d say it’s quite admirable to be one.

I have decided to accept your response.

An admirable decision...

Does the same apply here? I didnt even complain. But that leaves O, in the wrong category, does it not. O. needs to have her own section and kept in isolation.

[Get Real!]

Some people are complaining about their classification…

The list has nothing to do with how people see themselves and everything to do with how they come across to GR based on all their input thus far (that I have read and recall).

For example, you may feel inside you that you’re a “Hungarian-Anarchist” but if you’ve spent the last year or so mostly pushing for a Palestinian state then you’d fall under the “Pro-Palestinian” group and not under the “Hungarian-Anarchists”.

It’s basically the impression you have made on me based on what you’ve been pushing and the intensity of that and it’s not necessarily how the rest of the members see you. Please don’t take it too seriously because it’s only done for fun and it’s only MY opinion.

Regards, GR.

Ok then, in the spirit of the GR judgement please explain to me what a floater is. If you're going to bother making such a post then make sure we simpletons understand whats going on in your head.

It’s not a “floater” unless you’re talking about toilets! The actual phrase is an indivisible “floating voter” which technically refers to a non party-affiliated person who is undecided and forms part of the “swing” in an election result.

The borrowed “floating voter” as used here is that member who leans towards the “Let’s wait and see” view without being hampered by fixated standpoints. These people are more negotiable than others and exhibit a greater level of impartiality so I’d say it’s quite admirable to be one.

I have decided to accept your response.

An admirable decision...

Does the same apply here? I didnt even complain. But that leaves O, in the wrong category, does it not. O. needs to have her own section and kept in isolation.

Don't ask the obvious... I'd say you're a DEAD-CENTER floating voter even!

Mrs O is the least understood person on the forum... the perfect right-winged floating voter.

[denizaksulu]

Some people are complaining about their classification…

The list has nothing to do with how people see themselves and everything to do with how they come across to GR based on all their input thus far (that I have read and recall).

For example, you may feel inside you that you’re a “Hungarian-Anarchist” but if you’ve spent the last year or so mostly pushing for a Palestinian state then you’d fall under the “Pro-Palestinian” group and not under the “Hungarian-Anarchists”.

It’s basically the impression you have made on me based on what you’ve been pushing and the intensity of that and it’s not necessarily how the rest of the members see you. Please don’t take it too seriously because it’s only done for fun and it’s only MY opinion.

Regards, GR.

Ok then, in the spirit of the GR judgement please explain to me what a floater is. If you're going to bother making such a post then make sure we simpletons understand whats going on in your head.

It’s not a “floater” unless you’re talking about toilets! The actual phrase is an indivisible “floating voter” which technically refers to a non party-affiliated person who is undecided and forms part of the “swing” in an election result.

The borrowed “floating voter” as used here is that member who leans towards the “Let’s wait and see” view without being hampered by fixated standpoints. These people are more negotiable than others and exhibit a greater level of impartiality so I’d say it’s quite admirable to be one.

I have decided to accept your response.

An admirable decision...

Does the same apply here? I didnt even complain. But that leaves O, in the wrong category, does it not. O. needs to have her own section and kept in isolation.

Don't ask the obvious... I'd say you're a DEAD-CENTER floating voter even!

Mrs O is the least understood person on the forum... the perfect right-winged floating voter.

Thats why you asked her not to be 'sub-classified/divided' I suppose.

But as the 'Presidentess' I recon O needs some preferential trewarment fom you. (for old times sake, at least)