Viewpoint wrote:humanist wrote:It's not pushing you to live under GC administration, in a democratic country where there are minority groups and majority groups there is a government and people live under the governance of that government. You happened to be living in a country where you have a large number of a minority group. That is all there is to it, just like in Canada where a large minority group has French ancestry. They still live under the governance of the government elected in a democratic election where one person equals one vote.
In Britain where the largets of minority groups are perhaps of Indian ancenstry they live under the government of the day, they have not gotten up in arms demanding a separate State because they are one of the largest of th minority groups, who also experience discrimination and violence.
Did those minorities ever own the UK, you should compare us to the Scottish and Welsh not groups that arrived much later.
Who ruled (not owned) some other country for some period is irrelevant, otherwise most of Europe would belong to Nazis because they ruled it during some period.
But your second statement is correct. Scottish and Welsh are people that existed there for 1000s of years
and they have their own separate territories within which they have been the majority for many centuries (Scotland and Wales).
On the other hand the minorities, as you correctly said, arrived much later (just like the Turks in Cyprus) and do not own any separate territory (Just like the TCs in Cyprus).
The closer example to the one of TCs in Cyprus is the Turkish minority in Bulgaria. They were formed at about the same period, under the exact same circumstances, and they are about the same size as well.
So if we are going to use another country as a model, that should be Bulgaria.