samarkeolog wrote:Piratis wrote:My point was that if Islam is "intrusive", so is Christianity. Neither is.
The Turks were intrusive, not Islam.
How can you have intruded if you were invited? And they were not "Turks", but Ottomans, a multicultural empire that was administered by "Greeks" (Orthodox Christians), (Apostolic, Catholic, etc.) Armenians, and all of the others.
Changing Christian Churches into Muslim Mosques is rather intrusive don't you think?
Under Ottoman rule, the converted churches were the Latin churches of the previous colonial power. Architectural historian Camille Enlart (1987 [1899]: 77) said that 'the Greeks, left alone with the Turks after 1571, eagerly joined with them in obliterating all traces of the Latin domination'.
Obviously, I'm not defending any destruction, but if/when people condemn the Ottoman conversion/destruction of Latin places, they must condemn Greek Cypriots for it as well.
Enlart, C. 1987 [1899]:
Gothic art and the Renaissance in Cyprus. London: Trigraph Limited.
The Turks were never invited to Cyprus, they invaded us like they did in 1974. In 1974 the "ruler" (Samson) was not somebody we elected or we liked, but this didn't mean we wanted Turks to invade and kill us by the 1000s!
The same goes for 1571. Of course we didn't like the Venetians or any foreign ruler, but of course this didn't mean we wanted Ottoman troops invading Cyprus and killing people by the 10s of thousands.
Regarding the Greek Cypriots taking over places abandoned by the Venetians: Firstly it was the Turks who killed the Venetians, not us. Secondly we just took back what was ours to begin with.
Cyprus does not belong to any foreign ruler. It never belonged to Venetians, it never belonged to Ottomans, and it does not belong to the Turkish invaders today. All these are just
foreign rulers of land that belongs to us.