Nikitas wrote:Bananiot said:
"Correct me If I am wrong, but does Greece mean to have 6 miles of territorial waters (χωρικά ύδατα in Greek) and 10 miles of national air space? Is there another country in the world where the τerritorial water is not the same as the national aerospace? Is it not true that the majority of the dog fights between Greek and Turkish jets take place within this 6 to 10 miles space? Is it not also true that Greek war planes also violate the Turkish aerospace? Is it not true that these daily dogfights are taken as part of the practice routine of both air forces? At the same, has Greece given up on her notion of increasing the territorial waters to 10 miles? In this case wouldn't the Aegean Sea become a Greek lake?"
Bananiot,
When I was studying Public Intnernatiol Law in London, it happened that the man who taught me, Professor Mazawi, was also the British rep at the International Law of the Sea convention, so I have some pretty good first hand knowledge of the goings on.
Greece was AGAINST any change in the territorial waters rule and for obvious reasons. As a merchant maritime power she wanted maximum freedom of the seas. She was overruled and terriorial sea limits were extended to 12 miles.
So the 12 mile limit is something which came about despite Greek objections and which now is part of the general body of international law. Turkey has taken advantage of the rule and extended its waters in the Black sea and in the south to 12 miles. Greece has not given up her right to extend her waters to 12 miles.
When a nation extends its waters to 12 miles, under the rule, it does not exclude anyone from using these waters for innocent passage. The rule allows even armed warships to move through national waters within the parameters of "innocent passage" so the Aegean would not become a lake, let alone a Greek one if Greece extended its territorial waters to the limit the law allows.
Even with the current 6 mile limit, due to the 16000 kilometer coast line the Aegean is a "Greek lake" in the sense that most of its waters are national Greek waters.
The disparity between air and sea space is something Greece has been claiming since the 1930s and it was not considered a problem by Turkey, or anyone else, till the early 70s.
You are wrong to assert that dog fights occur in the 4 miles between the sea and air spaces. We have daily violations of Athens FIR, and of territorial air space near the Greek mainland. Evia is nowhere near Turkey, yet their jets often violate air space above Evia. The FIR violations are indicative of Turkish cynicism when they buzz airliners of other nations within the Athens FIR which they want to change so that all east Aegean islands will lie in Turkish FIR and planes going from the mainland to the Greek islands will have to file plans with Istanbul FIR and that idea is not going to fly.
The military exercise scenarios of Turkey should give you an idea of their approach. The basic theme is projection of power in the region between Greece and Cyprus, and they often like to assert their power in this area, as when they buzzed the plane carrying the Greek defence minister returning from Cyprus and the plance of the Greek president. These actions say a lot about who we are dealing with.
And for the record, there is no protest lodged by the Turkish foreign ministry alleging violations of their air space or FIR by Greek military planes.
Now add to the above the Turkish notion of "grey areas" in the Aegean, which include the island of Gavdos in the LIbyan sea south of Crete, the assertions by Mrs Ciller that Greece cannot extend its waters in the Ionian sea (facing Italy), the Imia crisis, Ecevit's repeated statements that the Dodecanese transfer to Greece was "a mistake", the formation of the Aegean Army, and you get a picture forming. Do you get the picture Bananiot?
Bananiot can put himself in the shoes of the enemy all he likes. This still does not change The International Law of The Seas, which clearly state that every nation has a right to extend her territorial seas out to 12nm. The airspace above sovereign territorial waters are by default national airspace.
http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_ ... /part2.htm
FIR however is not to be confused with national airspace. FIR are "Flight Information Regions" (International Airspace) which are handed to a jurisdictional authority by ICAO, for Air Traffic Control(ATC) purposes and Search and Rescue duties. Just because it is not national airspace does not mean aircraft are allowed to fly through an FIR without filing a Flight Plan. In fact this is illegal, and it is this the TAF does on an almost daily basis, necessitating interception by the HAF.
The worse thing of all, the TAF is endangering civil aircraft movements, and the flying public should be aware of the dangers of a potential mid air collision, particularly in a non radar controlled environment. Procedural Separation is achieved from 2 way communication between aircraft and ATC, and you can appreciate the potential danger if there are military jets playing silly buggers in the area and who are not necessarily on the same frequency. An accident waiting to happen!