Bananiot wrote:Actually it is a book that contains a number of excellent essays and "to dikaio tis pigmis" is just one of them but nevertheless it lends the title to the book. I think it will help many people understand why Turkey is a non permanent member of the Security Council, which may not be such a bad thing but it has got our whole leadership much worried.
Bananiot, there is no such thing as "to dikaio tis pigmis" (might is right.) There are legitimate and illegitimate interests that are wanted or needed to be served, and that "o skopos agiazei ta mesa" ("the end justifies the means!") No need to use sacred words or concepts such as "to dikaio" (justice,) to euphemistically describe the above truth!
Secondly, we all know how Turkey became a non-permanent member of the UN SC. Nothing special, since Greece was also a member, 2 years ago! The fact that Turkey participated in many UN missions, and that fact that Greece and the GC side did not drastically campaign against it (in fact Greece had an agreement with Turkey on the issue, to mutually do not oppose each other's candidacy) and the fact that Island, the other candidate of the 3 countries, had lost its leverage due to the recent international economic crisis, paved the way for Turkey to secure a place in it. Nothing remarkably special, nor does it give any significant power to Turkey over Cyprus. In fact, it will make things worse for her, for we all know that it refuses to recognize the RoC, but will now have to sign resolutions that imply its existence, if not recognition, and also will now be compelled to remain present when RoC representatives address the council or the General assembly, instead of walking away every time this was happening.