Viewpoint wrote:You are both dreaming, Turkey is not a European country that can embrace and adopt EU principles, the sheer fact that if Turkey gets anywhere near entry she will have the biggest say in the EU according to population will ensure that the goals posts will continue to change so as not to allow full membership. I applaud France and Germany for being honest and saying that only special partnership will be available, the others are bullshiting as they would not allow Turkey into the EU, they will use aby excuse especially the GCs to keep her out.
Just exactly have I been saying thats racist? I support either a level playing field for people to choose which side they wish to reside and under which administration, whats racist about this. I support all refugees get rights back to their properties where physically possible and compensation for those where it is not.
I support all armies GO after a comprehensive solution is agreed.
I support Maraş be returned after a comprehensive solution is agreed.
I support settlers on both sides go home after applying EU principles.
But knowing that neither side has vision or the desire to compromise on the above to create a new united Cyprus, agreed partition is the only real viable solution, feel free to prove me wrong.
Admitting that Turkey will help finding a solution to CyProb, still, she will never be a full member of E.U.
In case Turkey turns nasty, RoC has the power to veto, that much is agreed.
What Roc and Greece don't have, is the power to help to speed up Turkey's admission in the event of a solution to Cyprob.
This unfortunately something that can not happen as there are plenty of other E.U states opposed to her membership not only France and Germany, the big boys of E.U.
So, what we have here is an
asymmetrical power situation.
I personally both like and respect president Christophias, but I think he should revise his strategy if it is solely banking on Turkey's (improbable) E.U membership.