Insisting for ever on an unattainable BBF reunification agreement -given the grossly illegitimate and unacceptable Turkish /TC demands and claims, allowing in this way time to the other side to gradually and steadily succeed a non-agreed partition on the basis of the 37% of Cyprus they currently illegally occupy; is tantamount to an even higher degree of treason, than a negotiated and agreed partition on the basis of a reduced territory that will more accurately reflect the fair (demographic and property ownership) share of the TC community in Cyprus.
Negotiations on a solution on BBF have only just started and we should give the current process a chance. Those that seem to be in a haste to declare failure of the process, simply exhibit their inherent objections to the solution. We witnessed plenty of this currently and the list is headed by all the columnists of "Simerini" newspaper, the bastion of rejectionism.
Nikitas wrote
If the Annan plan is tempered with EU input and a saner territorial arrangement, and we deal with the guarantees issue then we are not that far apart. But the latest demands of separate jurisdiction in almost every sphere point to another direction.
I could not agree more. I would add time limits too. However, Christofias has to put this on the table. Talat did, before the new round started, but we rejected anything to do with the Annan Plan. This, I reckon, was the cause for Talat putting forward unreasonble demands.