Bananiot,
There is a clear difference in the approach of the two sides to this negotiating process and any objective observer can see it. The GC side is obviously oriented towards a truly independent country which functions as a true federation. There is open public discussion on the losses that the GC community will suffer in such a setup with direct warnings by President Christofias himself. The TC side is undermining the very concept of independence by insisting on the suzerainty of the WHOLE of the federation to Turkey. The TC side talks about give and take, but the emphasis is very much on the "take" so far, wintess the demands for separation on almost all state functions, including some which make no sense at all in the context of the EU (trade and health issues for example) and even this would be acceptable if it were not for the capping demand that even this bastardise version of BBF should be under mainland Turkish control, via the guarantees and military presence.
Asked by a Russian journalist this week why the EU guarantees would not be enough for the TCs Talat brought up the incredible excuse that GCs are members of the EU therefore the EU could not be trusted. He apparently is OK with several of these untrustoworthy EU countries to have contingents in the UNFICYP and for the whole of the EU to finance his government.
It is no surprise then that a growing section of the GC community see outright partition as a preferable solution to a bastardised BBF and a subversive enemy of Cypriot Independence like Talat being their "rotating president".
As you said in your signature, in life there are only options. To which I add that every option has positive and negative aspects and this is true for all the possible options in Cyprus, including BBF, partition and others.