As I expected Bananiot avoided answering. His only concern is that in the conflict that the Turks started and where they murdered 10s of thousands of Cypriots in order to keep Cyprus under their rule by force, some tiny in comparison number of Turks got killed and suffered as well.
The truth is that Cyprus is just another Greek island which has been denied its freedom and self-determination by means of brute force and blackmail.
But Bananiot doesn't care about the truth. What he cares about is to say what the Turks like to hear, thinking that we can build trust and friendship based on lies.
Sorry Bananiot, but I can not play your games. If you believe that the truth is somehting that should be silenced then the best you can do is stop asking the questions. We are not going around the forum "advertising" that Cyprus is Greek, but don't expect from us to lie when you ask the question if Cyprus is Greek, just because you made lies part of your policy.
Now I will say the only valid argument that you could make, but you didn't have the balls to say it because that would spoil your image: That giving up part of our identity and promoting some lies would be a small price to pay if by doing so we can create a united and peaceful "just Cypriot" nation that can avoid the centuries old Greek-Turkish enmity.
That would be an argument which would have some base. If I believed that such thing could actually work in reality then, I wouldn't lie, but I would just remain silent and let you do the lying (since you don't mind). I believe this is what DT is doing, but instead of appreciating it you were instead trying to force him to lie.
Unfortunately the only argument that Bananiot could have still wouldn't stand in reality. For such thing to work it has to be the aim of both sides, not just one. The Turkish leadership had division and segregation as an aim right from the beginning, when during their rule they divided the Cypriot population between higher class Muslims with more rights, and lower class Christians with less rights. This policy remains unchanged until today, and there is no sign that it could change.
Therefore even if we give up part of the identity of the Cypriot people and Cyprus, nothing positive would be gained. On the contrary, by allowing such distortions in our history we would make it much easier for the Turks to excuse their crimes against us, and would alienate the rest of Greeks which are the only close allies that we have.
Furthermore doing such thing would set a terrible president. If we accept that Cyprus is not Greek just because brute force and blackmail was applied against us, then due to the same reasons we could also accept that north Cyprus is not "just Cypriot", but it is "Turkish Cypriot", and finally "just Turkish" because again brute force is applied in that direction. The aim of the Turkish policy is clear, and can be seen from the way they named the occupied part of our island: "
Turkish republic of northern Cyprus". Not "Cypriot Republic" or even "Turkish Cypriot Republic", but just Turkish. This is why the partitionists are the biggest fans of Bananiot, because he is helping them achieve their aim of partition and permanent Turkification of the north part of our island.
So are we willing to accept that the identity of a territory is not set by its history and the identity of its native population, but instead by the brute force and blackmail that some foreign invader applies? If we accept such thing then the result is not a "Just Cypriot" Cyprus, but partition and the north part of our island becoming a "Turkish Cyprus".
For this reason I reject the argument that faking our history and giving up part of our identity can have any positive result, unless there is a clear indication that the other side is willing to accept a "just Cypriot" Cyprus without any kind of segregation and divisions.