GeorgeV97qaue wrote:Mikkie well said mate totally agree with you. This is the reason why the Annan plan was rejected. GC's were not allowed feedom of movement in their own country. I would accept a solution where TC's can adminster the North but all GC's being allowed to return if they wish. No limits nothing.
I'm affraid that will not happen though so me thinks no EU for TC's just continued isolation as they put it which is a shame. Both people can live together I know they can. Forget the past. Everyone knows what happened.
The problem we have though is people like Zan and Oracle just keep spouting the same old lines which doesnt help the current climate.
Don't get too excited, because the Turks do not have an objection in Greek Cypriots being allowed to return and settle back home in the north, a long as it is under their racially based exclusive administration. In other words, the Greek Cypriots may freely return and settle in the north, start business and invest money, but they will not have any political and cultural rights from within the place (state) of their residence. Such a right to vote for local (state) legislating and governing elections, according to their warped thesis, will only have to be reserved for anyone who speaks Turkish as his native language, including the settlers from Turkey. Any GCs returning north, will be regarded as "sheep for milking," i.e. invest money to boost the TC economy and pay taxes to the TC state, but no decision making (voting) rights. In other words, apartheid in Europe, in an EU member state, and formal eradication of any GC heritage rights, after thousands of years of existence in the north!
You in here speak about the EU aqui, but this is meaningless as long as our side decides to accept the Turkish claims and thesis. And I have to inform you that there are people among the GC negotiating team, like for example defeatist Toumazos Tsielepis, who are ready to accommodate the Turkish demands. Toumazos Tsielepis, in an article in “Politis” newspaper of last February, argued in favour of us accepting the status of “eterodomotes” (those permanently residing in one place but exercise their political rights in another place) so that we “alleviate” the “fears” of the TCs in "accepting" the GCs to return back to their territory from which they were illegally expelled.