Paphitis wrote:ttoli wrote:Oracle wrote:zan wrote:OK Miss Bobbit...Lets get back to that shall we........Whose land did you build an airport on...How much TC land have you built roads on...You expect us to sit and wait for you but get upset when we don't...Tough luck matey......
Zan when will you understand, that as the invaders, none of this land is "TC" land or "Turkish" land .... only
temporarily occupied!
Never thought I'd say
thais but thank you
Oral cle so you say that the land is only temporarily occupied but then go on to say its been stolen?
Theft is defined in English law as an attempt to
PERMANANTLY depreive someone of their
possesions.So using your logic the Turks are NOT
theives at all,
Enage brain in future love, go on admit it, your Blond aren't you?
Jesus! I have never seen so
many spelling errors in such a small post. Even Halil can do better!
You expect an answer when you can not even spell?
I think you are
definitely blond!!
Paphitis he stumbles every time he attempts a rebuttal. This man must be getting so worried he will lose the GC-owned home he has bought so cheaply.
Just because the thief thinks he has acquired something illegally with a view to keeping it
permanently, and is punished by the law (ttoli has no doubt seen the wrong side all too often) for taking something illegally and keeping it with a view to making it permanently his ... it does not mean the victim who was deprived, does not believe he will get his goods back .... so sees the loss as only
temporary.
When the cops get the stolen goods back, they don't dismiss the thief because he was not in possession of the goods "permanently" .... the thief's intention was to do that, but he was thwarted. Same with the TCs.
This does not detract from the crime or recognizing it as such.
So the TCs think they will have the north permanently .... hence they are criminals.
But I know we will get our land back .... as good always wins in the end!