Cyprus-Forum.com

[Paphitis]

British terrorists not frustrated religious loners:

MI5 report

London, Aug 21 (ANI): British terrorists are just as likely to be married with children and have little religious background as they are to be fundamentalist loners, a leaked MI5 study has said.

Research from the security service found it was impossible to draw up a typical profile of a “British Terrorist” contradicting the perception that all are traditional religious fanatics or Islamic fundamentalists, The Telegraph reported.

The classified report on radicalisation concluded there is no single pathway to violent extremism and no easy way to identify those who would become involved in terrorism in Britain.

Source: Wordpress

I, for one, had already read this. Pleased to see you don't call them freedom fighters.

I don't euphemise, as you know. But I am still waiting to see how all this fits into Cyprus Problem .....

Don't be shy or are you saying you don't recognise the numerous killings of civilians such as the school teaacher I mentioned?

How about Catherine Cutliffe?

Perhaps you wish to explain the oppression, and enslavement, and of the Cypriot people.

The Cypriot people had every right to fight for their self determination which you brutally opposed. You imprisoned and tortured our people, took away their freedom and dignity.

[Magnus]

Generally cowards, afraid of meeting face to face, those they believe are the enemy they lay bombs, shoot, kill and run away.

As a member of the 'A-Team' you are no doubt a master tactician (although I remember Hannibal as being the brains of the outfit). Given your vast military experience, can you please explain how a smaller force of untrained individuals with outdated equipment can effectively combat a professional military force without use of 'guerilla' tactics? We aren't all able to create tanks out of a broken fork lift truck and a bit of drainpipe.

[Mr. T]

British terrorists not frustrated religious loners:

MI5 report

London, Aug 21 (ANI): British terrorists are just as likely to be married with children and have little religious background as they are to be fundamentalist loners, a leaked MI5 study has said.

Research from the security service found it was impossible to draw up a typical profile of a “British Terrorist” contradicting the perception that all are traditional religious fanatics or Islamic fundamentalists, The Telegraph reported.

The classified report on radicalisation concluded there is no single pathway to violent extremism and no easy way to identify those who would become involved in terrorism in Britain.

Source: Wordpress

I, for one, had already read this. Pleased to see you don't call them freedom fighters.

I don't euphemise, as you know. But I am still waiting to see how all this fits into Cyprus Problem .....

Don't be shy or are you saying you don't recognise the numerous killings of civilians such as the school teaacher I mentioned?

How about Catherine Cutliffe?

Perhaps you wish to explain the oppression, and enslavement, and of the Cypriot people.

The Cypriot people had every right to fight for their self determination which you brutally opposed. You imprisoned and tortured our people, took away their freedom and dignity.

Perhaps you should get a good dictionary and look up the meaning of the words 'oppression' and 'enslavement' . May I suggest you consider the Oxford English dictionary. It shows you are using words in error.

I am not surprised for one second that you are a supporter of killings of women and children by cowards and doubt whether you realise that this is what started the events that culminated in Turkey's attack in 1974.

GC's brought the problem upon themselves and are in a state of self denial.

[Paphitis]

British terrorists not frustrated religious loners:

MI5 report

London, Aug 21 (ANI): British terrorists are just as likely to be married with children and have little religious background as they are to be fundamentalist loners, a leaked MI5 study has said.

Research from the security service found it was impossible to draw up a typical profile of a “British Terrorist” contradicting the perception that all are traditional religious fanatics or Islamic fundamentalists, The Telegraph reported.

The classified report on radicalisation concluded there is no single pathway to violent extremism and no easy way to identify those who would become involved in terrorism in Britain.

Source: Wordpress

I, for one, had already read this. Pleased to see you don't call them freedom fighters.

I don't euphemise, as you know. But I am still waiting to see how all this fits into Cyprus Problem .....

Don't be shy or are you saying you don't recognise the numerous killings of civilians such as the school teaacher I mentioned?

How about Catherine Cutliffe?

Perhaps you wish to explain the oppression, and enslavement, and of the Cypriot people.

The Cypriot people had every right to fight for their self determination which you brutally opposed. You imprisoned and tortured our people, took away their freedom and dignity.

Perhaps you should get a good dictionary and look up the meaning of the words 'oppression' and 'enslavement' . May I suggest you consider the Oxford English dictionary. It shows you are using words in error.

I am not surprised for one second that you are a supporter of killings of women and children by cowards and doubt whether you realise that this is what started the events that culminated in Turkey's attack in 1974.

GC's brought the problem upon themselves and are in a state of self denial.

Cypriots bought the problems upon themselves because they dared to fight for their own self determination. The British were ruthless and oppressive rulers in Cyprus. Our people were subjected to torture and curfews and were never allowed to express themselves. When Cypriots decided to fight for their self determination, Britain cleverly subjected both GCs and TCs to "divide and rule". The TMT was then formed and the British Auxilliary Police Force, comprising mostly TCs, resulted in GCs and TCs to engage each other in hostilities. This led to further Intercommunal violence in the 60s and and then ultimately to the Turkish Invasion after the CIA sponsored Greek coup in 1974.

[CopperLine]

Perhaps it is because of the cowardly way they kill and maim those they think of as their enemy or merely because it suits their supposed cause or excuse for killing ..........................

............... Generally cowards, afraid of meeting face to face, those they believe are the enemy they lay bombs, shoot, kill and run away.

Errrrr ... Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresden, Hamburg, My Lai, Lidice, and on and on and on

[Meraklis!]

British terrorists not frustrated religious loners:

MI5 report

London, Aug 21 (ANI): British terrorists are just as likely to be married with children and have little religious background as they are to be fundamentalist loners, a leaked MI5 study has said.

Research from the security service found it was impossible to draw up a typical profile of a “British Terrorist” contradicting the perception that all are traditional religious fanatics or Islamic fundamentalists, The Telegraph reported.

The classified report on radicalisation concluded there is no single pathway to violent extremism and no easy way to identify those who would become involved in terrorism in Britain.

Source: Wordpress

I, for one, had already read this. Pleased to see you don't call them freedom fighters.

I don't euphemise, as you know. But I am still waiting to see how all this fits into Cyprus Problem .....

Don't be shy or are you saying you don't recognise the numerous killings of civilians such as the school teaacher I mentioned?

How about Catherine Cutliffe?

Perhaps you wish to explain the oppression, and enslavement, and of the Cypriot people.

The Cypriot people had every right to fight for their self determination which you brutally opposed. You imprisoned and tortured our people, took away their freedom and dignity.

Perhaps you should get a good dictionary and look up the meaning of the words 'oppression' and 'enslavement' . May I suggest you consider the Oxford English dictionary. It shows you are using words in error.

I am not surprised for one second that you are a supporter of killings of women and children by cowards and doubt whether you realise that this is what started the events that culminated in Turkey's attack in 1974.

GC's brought the problem upon themselves and are in a state of self denial.

it must have taken years of hard work for you to be this much of a spastic!

[Mr. T]

British terrorists not frustrated religious loners:

MI5 report

London, Aug 21 (ANI): British terrorists are just as likely to be married with children and have little religious background as they are to be fundamentalist loners, a leaked MI5 study has said.

Research from the security service found it was impossible to draw up a typical profile of a “British Terrorist” contradicting the perception that all are traditional religious fanatics or Islamic fundamentalists, The Telegraph reported.

The classified report on radicalisation concluded there is no single pathway to violent extremism and no easy way to identify those who would become involved in terrorism in Britain.

Source: Wordpress

I, for one, had already read this. Pleased to see you don't call them freedom fighters.

I don't euphemise, as you know. But I am still waiting to see how all this fits into Cyprus Problem .....

Don't be shy or are you saying you don't recognise the numerous killings of civilians such as the school teaacher I mentioned?

How about Catherine Cutliffe?

Perhaps you wish to explain the oppression, and enslavement, and of the Cypriot people.

The Cypriot people had every right to fight for their self determination which you brutally opposed. You imprisoned and tortured our people, took away their freedom and dignity.

Perhaps you should get a good dictionary and look up the meaning of the words 'oppression' and 'enslavement' . May I suggest you consider the Oxford English dictionary. It shows you are using words in error.

I am not surprised for one second that you are a supporter of killings of women and children by cowards and doubt whether you realise that this is what started the events that culminated in Turkey's attack in 1974.

GC's brought the problem upon themselves and are in a state of self denial.

Cypriots bought the problems upon themselves because they dared to fight for their own self determination. The British were ruthless and oppressive rulers in Cyprus. Our people were subjected to torture and curfews and were never allowed to express themselves. When Cypriots decided to fight for their self determination, Britain cleverly subjected both GCs and TCs to "divide and rule". The TMT was then formed and the British Auxilliary Police Force, comprising mostly TCs, resulted in GCs and TCs to engage each other in hostilities. This led to further Intercommunal violence in the 60s and and then ultimately to the Turkish Invasion after the CIA sponsored Greek coup in 1974.

It is good to see that you agree that GC's brought the problems upon yourselves. Such comprehension of the facts is rare among extremists on this forum which makes me wonder how you can still hold such extreme views.
I have heard of this conspiracy theory before and lived in Cyprus in the 60's when, even after independence, your terrorist bloodthirsty heroes were still not averse to shooting a Brit in the back. I have kept in touch with developments on the island since them and not getting my information from propaganda ridden GC school text books I could have an advantage over you.

You don't know how lucky you were having Britain as a colonial power.

Tell me what colonial power was more benign.

Would you have preferred to Turkey remain in control ?

Portugal an ally of Britain for centuries could have been an alternative. Take their actions in Goa just as one example. The local population were given the right to change their religion to the Catholic faith or as an alternative they could keep their existing religion and take advantage of the opportunity of being executed. Those who made the wrong decision were killed. Such a shame that they didn't control Cyprus as they would surely have been better for you than the British.

[Magnus]

I have heard of this conspiracy theory before and lived in Cyprus in the 60's when, even after independence, your terrorist bloodthirsty heroes were still not averse to shooting a Brit in the back.

The 1960s? Is this when your 'brave lads' were happily arming Turkish extremists and stirring up inter-communal conflict between Cypriots?

[Mr. T]

British terrorists not frustrated religious loners:

MI5 report

London, Aug 21 (ANI): British terrorists are just as likely to be married with children and have little religious background as they are to be fundamentalist loners, a leaked MI5 study has said.

Research from the security service found it was impossible to draw up a typical profile of a “British Terrorist” contradicting the perception that all are traditional religious fanatics or Islamic fundamentalists, The Telegraph reported.

The classified report on radicalisation concluded there is no single pathway to violent extremism and no easy way to identify those who would become involved in terrorism in Britain.

Source: Wordpress

I, for one, had already read this. Pleased to see you don't call them freedom fighters.

I don't euphemise, as you know. But I am still waiting to see how all this fits into Cyprus Problem .....

Don't be shy or are you saying you don't recognise the numerous killings of civilians such as the school teaacher I mentioned?

How about Catherine Cutliffe?

Perhaps you wish to explain the oppression, and enslavement, and of the Cypriot people.

The Cypriot people had every right to fight for their self determination which you brutally opposed. You imprisoned and tortured our people, took away their freedom and dignity.

Perhaps you should get a good dictionary and look up the meaning of the words 'oppression' and 'enslavement' . May I suggest you consider the Oxford English dictionary. It shows you are using words in error.

I am not surprised for one second that you are a supporter of killings of women and children by cowards and doubt whether you realise that this is what started the events that culminated in Turkey's attack in 1974.

GC's brought the problem upon themselves and are in a state of self denial.

it must have taken years of hard work for you to be this much of a spastic!

There are quite a few words for those incapable of argument but only able to make inane comments.

I guess Meraklis is a Greek word and if so is one such word.

I'm feeling quite pleased with myself getting quite so many of the sad GC extremists on this site responding on this thread. It can't be far off a full house.

[Mr. T]

Generally cowards, afraid of meeting face to face, those they believe are the enemy they lay bombs, shoot, kill and run away.

As a member of the 'A-Team' you are no doubt a master tactician (although I remember Hannibal as being the brains of the outfit). Given your vast military experience, can you please explain how a smaller force of untrained individuals with outdated equipment can effectively combat a professional military force without use of 'guerilla' tactics? We aren't all able to create tanks out of a broken fork lift truck and a bit of drainpipe.

So this is why they murdered the likes of a doctor, a school teacher and a woman out shopping.