zan wrote:Welcome to the forum Vuryek......
Thank you for your explanation but I must insist that you tell all here your entire views on Cyprus. You are obviously against Turkeys involvement in Cyprus but can you please tell us what your solution will be. It is only fair for all to know so we can cut out any confusion. Thank you in advance.
Dear friend, it is not possible to express “entire views” with 3 paragraphs. Every issue has both independent and related deep details thus if we are curious, our views are changing directly and dynamically related with our learning process. So I think it will be a more honest behaviour to think that we will learn and understand everybody’s views in time. Also, as you know, short and quick statements bring misunderstandings.
You want me to tell you “my solution”, but since solution is a not a kind of mathematical problem we have to accept its sociological, economical, socio-psychological, educational, political sides and you know each side is a kind of deep discussions. But let me explain how Turkey effects these issues with few examples.
If we want to talk about solution, first we have to talk about circumstances to get a provision of what we are capable of. Turkey’s “involvement” brings more criteria to discuss in Cyprus Problem? When we consider that Turkey is a completely separated country who thinks and moves only for itself, you can realize that it brings some unnatural additional criteria, which are not representing us, to our problem. Some of these criteria are completely blocked issues which are created to block solution. I think it is clear that we have less to “discuss” without Turkey’s “polite presence”.
Second, the authorities, whom the world named them as “Turkish Cypriot Leadership” and Turkey named them as “T.R.N.C.”, are neither a “government”, nor a “leadership” even not a simple authority. These servants only represent the orders of Turkey, which comes through Turkish Embassy. Not realistic? Why don’t you compare the speeches of Talat, Ferdi, which they made before their “presidency” and after their “presidency”? Anyone want me to post some examples? How can you explain the difference between Cypriotic speeches and Denktash like speeches of Talat’s and his fellows’s ? How can you explain the flexibility of their ideas which changes with “ideology” of Turkish Government? They become fascist with Grey Wolfs, religionist with AKP (which is present government), militarists with MGK (non changing military government of turkey) and you expect me to say that they are an independent leadership? Nobody can sit on that “TRNC chairs” if they will not follow orders of Turkey... Talat is not representing Cypriots, he is even not representing himself. Once Talat said “Because of the (fascism of) Greek Cypriots, I start to act like Denktash!” Was he talking about our Greek Cypriots who elected Christofias , instead of Papadapulos (sorry for spelling) or was he talking about another parallel world? What a paradox.
If I am wrong then please inform me about why have they brought Turkey’s education system? Why are they still building mosques to everywhere? Why are they trying to bring fanatic religion education to occupied area by both legal and illegal ways? Why have they brought their Turkey’s nationalist trade unions to occupied area? Why have they give permission to destroy ancient ruins, historical places to build up hotels of Turkish developers? Why population of settlers are more than 2 times of Cypriots? (Once Talat said “If we count all military, settlers “our” population can be approximately five hundred thousand”) Why approximately %40 of North Cyprus is military area? Why “Turkish Cypriot courts” cannot touch the settlers? Why every technical committee and working group includes at least 2 nationalist and 1broucrat? Who put them there? Who is paying for the economy of that “TRNC” thing (Once Ferdi Sabit Soyer said that Turkey is paying 500 million YTL for every year)? ... as you know we cannot list all of them today. We call assimilation to this process, and will bring integration.
These circumstances are a clear provision of permanent problem and they can be disappear with “un-involvement” of Turkey and there is no doubt that details and identification of our problem can change without occupation.
Turkey is not occupying Cyprus to save or protect Turkish Cypriots. Turkey is occupying Cyprus only for geopolitics. Everybody understood that schools history books were completely lie, which says “Turkey saved us from monsters and vampires which need to feed with Turks” (Not real? Read the book of Vehbi Zeki Serter). Both books of Makarios Drushotis and Mehmet Ali Tremesheli are high quality proof of what Turkey did between 1955-1974. Many times Turkish organisations killed Turkish Cypriots and blame Greek Cypriots. Turkish Army killed both GC, and TC and we are still talking about involvement of Turkey!
Turkey is not a kind of unresistable force. If we really want, we can send them back. We just need to get our voice higher to make International Arena to hear that even TC don’t want Turkey in Cyprus. We can handle by ourselves.
Could you now explain me why we need Turkey for solution?
And no, ROC is not an occupier. I want to remind you that TC have left ROC parliament and have built a new “"!!??government!!??" under the "!!??protection!!??" of Turkey”.