Part of my thesis entails historical parallels that could apply to the Cyprus problem. One of these - the Sudetenland of Czechoslovakia in 1938-1939 - came to my attention. For those of you not historically inclined to that period, the Sudeten Germans (a large ethnic minority) living in Western Czechoslovakia were used as a pretext for Nazi Germany to force the Sudetenland's cession to the Third Reich, and later on becoming a springboard to take over the rest of the Czechoslovak state. After WW2 ended, the Czech government got the allies' blessings to expel the Sudeten Germans from the Sudetenland, on the grounds that this group could never again be 'a knife at the throat of Czechoslovakia'.
Looking at this precedent, it is not overly difficult to see something of a comparison between Nazi Germany and the Sudetenland vis-a-vis Turkey and the Turkish Cypriots. Both examples have the justification of going in on the pretext of 'protecting their brethern', and both ended up going further than that - in the latter case, the Turkish military taking over of a third of Cyprus after the initial incursion helped cause the attempted Sampson coup to collapse. I want to make it clear though that I don't want to take the comparison further than that for obvious reasons as the local situations in Sudetenland 1938 and Cyprus 1934 are not mirror images. I'm using the comparison solely for the purpose of generalization of ethnic minority supported by 'mother country'.
Getting back to the comparison, if the Sudetenland precedent is applied all the way, then we are faced with a prospect of a re-unified Cyprus under Greek majority rule expelling all Turkish Cypriots on the same grounds that the Czechs did to the Sudeten Germans. (By the way, I'm not talking about settlers here. Those brought in by Turkey have no ligitimate right to reside on the islands and must leave), but given the bitterness of partition, would the Greek Cypriots - if regaining control of the entire island - have the entire Turkish Cypriot presence removed on the grounds of 'ridding the knife at their throats'? How attractive would this scenario be to the Greek Cypriot folk on this forum should control of the entire island be immediately regained? To the Turkish Cypriot folk, do you think that the Greek Cypriots would do such a thing if the northern administration and the Turkish Forces at this moment ceased to exist?
I would like to get some sound arguments for the forum folk that both support and debunk this historical precedent to help my work on this part of the thesis (135 pages and counting thus far). Is such drastic action like what happened in Sudetenland an inevitable conclusion for Cyprus, or if some form of co-habitation could still prevail in a unitary state after such a long and bitter partition? I want to eliminate federalism or confederalism as that comes under another section of the thesis. In short: Is a unitary state in Cyprus still possible now, and how would it prevail?