Raymanoff, I agree some Mac users are fanatics indeed. It's like a cult much thanks to Guy Kawasaki, the evangelist.
I'm a Mac user by choice and tradition. I think the Intel move was a good one. Now I can use Windows on my Mac hardware instead of having two separate machines (Virtual PC for Mac sucked).
Some of the software I use is not available for PC. Those that are usually run better in OS X than Windows. I couldn't live without Windows, but if I had to choose I'd choose OS X.
I can run OS X and Windows (and Linux) on my Mac hardware legally. You can run OS X on any Intel platform, but you'd have to break the law in order to do it.
A Hackintosh will not be as stable as a real Mac (you will always have the trouble of patching the kernel when a new 10.x.x version is released). Trust me, I've been mucking around with such installations. The only way to achieve a really stable system is to build a PC with exactly the same hardware as in a Mac... and it won't be much cheaper, if cheaper at all.
The good thing about using a Mac is that the OS is written for the particular hardware. That's why it's as stable as it is.
The good thing about using Windows is that it's written to support as many different hardware platforms as possible (while relying on 3rd party drivers)... and that's also the weakness... too many cooks spoil the broth.
Choose your PC hardware wisely and take care of your Windows system and it will run very well. But I still think OS X is superior to Windows. Linux is superior to Windows. Unfortunately the strength with Linux is also its weakness... the lack of commercial de facto standard applications. OS X is pretty much the best of two worlds... open source and closed source combined. A lot of commercial software available and enough freeware/shareware available to satisfy most users.
I think Apple will release OS X to be used on any Intel hardware some day in the future. I know they like to think of themselves as a hardware company. But take away the sleek design and the fact that they have an ace up their sleeve with the hardware/software symbiosis and it's obvious that at the end of the day most consumers who choose Apple are choosing Apple because they like using OS X and the applications available for the OS in question. The design is a nice bonus. Those who buy a Mac simply because it looks great and then just run Windows XP on it are stupid and have more money than brains.
The world is ready for OS X on any Intel platform, but Apple is not... I think they're too protective. But sooner or later we will see a change of stance towards 3rd party hardware and OS X.
Whether we choose OS X, Windows or some Linux alternative certainly depends on our personal preferences and what kind of applications we like/need. Some of us need several OS platforms to be able to do what we want.