denizaksulu wrote:kafenes wrote:denizaksulu wrote:Bananiot wrote:Limnitis has never been an open gate Kikapu. I think it may be the next to open. The furore that arose was the refusal to allow pilgrims to cross it to go to nearby Morphou, when all the signals sent were that the granting of permission was just a formality.
I reckon it was a message to Talat that the army still holds the aces and making it difficult for Talat a couple of days before the talks were scheduled to start is like playing the generals' game.
Just a thought. Whilst there three weeks ago I heard of demonstrations by TC's who are against any move to return 'Morphou' to the GC's.
Perhaps under the circumstances the Northern administration thought that there may have been a 'security' issue here. Considering that both GCs and TCs have their own hot heads..............................
Like what kind of 'security' issue, for example, Deniz?
Like a lot of unpleasant noises to the effect that they would rather die than give Morphou up. With this kind of rhetoric it could cause problems.
Hey Kafenes. I am not supporting anything here. I am just trying to find a 'rationale' for their actions (or inactions). Some actions seem 'illogical'. I am trying to find some logic here. If you have read my previous posts - as I am sure you have - you will see my own response. Personally I do not wish the repeat of the 'Solomou' incident. It would take just one idiot..........
Deniz, I know what you mean. I didn't say you are being supportive, but just wondered what kind of security problems there could be since there are other crossings open.