denizaksulu wrote:Bananiot wrote:Limnitis has never been an open gate Kikapu. I think it may be the next to open. The furore that arose was the refusal to allow pilgrims to cross it to go to nearby Morphou, when all the signals sent were that the granting of permission was just a formality.
I reckon it was a message to Talat that the army still holds the aces and making it difficult for Talat a couple of days before the talks were scheduled to start is like playing the generals' game.
Just a thought. Whilst there three weeks ago I heard of demonstrations by TC's who are against any move to return 'Morphou' to the GC's.
Perhaps under the circumstances the Northern administration thought that there may have been a 'security' issue here. Considering that both GCs and TCs have their own hot heads..............................
Yes, Yeni Düzen reports Talat as saying:
http://www.yeniduzengazetesi.com/templa ... 2&zoneid=3
“Resmi kapı olmayan, kayıt yapılamayan Yeşilırmak’tan Kuzey’e toplu geçiş sakıncalı olurdu. Türklerin buradan Erenköy’e gitmesiyle, Rumların Güzelyurt’a gelmesi aynı şey değil. Çünkü Erenköy kapalı bölge, yerleşim bölgesi değil. Buraya giden BM konvoyuyla gider ve başka bir yere gidemez. Ama ayin için Güzelyurt’a gelen isterse 3 gün sonra Metehan’dan döner. Kayıt olmayacağına göre nasıl kontrol edeceksiniz...”
TRANSLATION:
“It would have been objectionable for a mass crossing from Limnitis, which is not an official crossing point and where records cannot be made, to the North. For the Turks to go from here to Kokkina is not the same thing as Greek Cypriots coming to Morphou. This is because Kokkina is a closed area, it is not a residential area. Those going here go in a UN convoy and cannot go elsewhere. But somebody who goes to Morphou for a religious service may, if they wish, return via Agios Dometios 3 days later. Since there can be no records, how are you going to supervise this.”
Security issues did exist, as voiced by Talat. However, as I have said before, this could have been overcome by laying on a sufficient number of buses to transport the pilgrims. Identity checks could have been carried out on the way, and it could have been made mandatory to return on the same bus after the service. Since the Turkish Cypriots were previously transported to Kokkina by bus, this arrangement would not even have infringed the principle of reciprocity. I don’t think this was the point. I am afraid that the real masters in the north of Cyprus do not wish to send out a good will message at this point in time.