humanist wrote:and your still not seeing a penny VP.....................
You are the bigger losers here the 4 billion dollars refers to lost "RoC" revenues for not being able to enter Turkish docks. The income for Turkey is miniscule in comparison.
humanist wrote:and your still not seeing a penny VP.....................
BC Numismatics wrote:Oracle,
The British Commonwealth would be better off in sorting out the Cyprus problem,as all member states of the British Commonwealth have made it clear to Turkey that their occupation of northern Cyprus is illegal - PURE & SIMPLE!
Aidan.
Oracle wrote:How effective has the UN been in solving the Cyprus Problem?
After 34 years the UN has proved ineffective in removing the invaders, despite countless Resolution breaches by Turkey.
Shouldn't we now relegate it to secondary status over our closer to home EU partners?
Is the fact that the UN is based in the US, influencing decision making?
With such a potential bias base, and knowing the detrimental influence of the US in Cyprus Politics, should we continue to put so much trust in the UN?
What has the UN delivered after over 3 decades?
If the Annan plan wasn't proof enough of its Bias ... what more proof do we need that it does not have the best interests of GCs at heart, but Turkey?
Time to ditch the UN as a Negotiating partner and bring in the EU!
iceman wrote:Oracle wrote:How effective has the UN been in solving the Cyprus Problem?
After 34 years the UN has proved ineffective in removing the invaders, despite countless Resolution breaches by Turkey.
Shouldn't we now relegate it to secondary status over our closer to home EU partners?
Is the fact that the UN is based in the US, influencing decision making?
With such a potential bias base, and knowing the detrimental influence of the US in Cyprus Politics, should we continue to put so much trust in the UN?
What has the UN delivered after over 3 decades?
If the Annan plan wasn't proof enough of its Bias ... what more proof do we need that it does not have the best interests of GCs at heart, but Turkey?
Time to ditch the UN as a Negotiating partner and bring in the EU!
Hahahahaha...In Turkish we say "lick the palm of your hand so that your balls don't swell"
keep wishing...
when it suits you "bring in the UN resolutions" when it doesn't suit you "Fuck UN,lets bring in EU"...
You think the world revolves around you don't you?
When you created the Cyprus problem there was no EU,so whatever solution there will be it will be through United Nations not European Union you joined..
now let me hear your next wish..
humanist wrote:VP unless you're taking money from the treasury the biggest looser is you and the rest of TC's I wasn't refering to Turkey. OOooopps I forgot if it doesn't affect VP it dfoesn't affect the other 60,000 TC's. forgive me for my oversight
Oracle wrote:iceman wrote:Oracle wrote:How effective has the UN been in solving the Cyprus Problem?
After 34 years the UN has proved ineffective in removing the invaders, despite countless Resolution breaches by Turkey.
Shouldn't we now relegate it to secondary status over our closer to home EU partners?
Is the fact that the UN is based in the US, influencing decision making?
With such a potential bias base, and knowing the detrimental influence of the US in Cyprus Politics, should we continue to put so much trust in the UN?
What has the UN delivered after over 3 decades?
If the Annan plan wasn't proof enough of its Bias ... what more proof do we need that it does not have the best interests of GCs at heart, but Turkey?
Time to ditch the UN as a Negotiating partner and bring in the EU!
Hahahahaha...In Turkish we say "lick the palm of your hand so that your balls don't swell"
keep wishing...
when it suits you "bring in the UN resolutions" when it doesn't suit you "Fuck UN,lets bring in EU"...
You think the world revolves around you don't you?
When you created the Cyprus problem there was no EU,so whatever solution there will be it will be through United Nations not European Union you joined..
now let me hear your next wish..
Not so fast iceman .... I didn't say to ditch the UN Resolutions.
It is a matter of deciding what the UN's on-going role should be.
The UN is great as a professional witness, a gatherer of evidence like an unbiased policeman or detective on duty! These it presents as Resolutions which have been breached or up-held by the parties (Cyprus vs Turkey).
But when it comes to brain power, negotiating, evaluating the evidence, passing judgement and handing out the punishment towards a solution .... we don't let Police Constable Plod or Inspector Clouseau to do all that do we?
So why should the UN gather the evidence as a witness and then go on to be the judge too? ... or worse, prepare a solution based only on its own judgement without listening to Lawyers/Representatives ... resulting in something like the Annan Plan!
So the UN's role should be only to provide the evidence .... and the EU provides the lawyers, barristers to present our case and arbitrate or negotiate alongside us.
Viewpoint wrote:humanist wrote:and your still not seeing a penny VP.....................
You are the bigger losers here the 4 billion dollars refers to lost "RoC" revenues for not being able to enter Turkish docks. The income for Turkey is miniscule in comparison.
Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:humanist wrote:and your still not seeing a penny VP.....................
You are the bigger losers here the 4 billion dollars refers to lost "RoC" revenues for not being able to enter Turkish docks. The income for Turkey is miniscule in comparison.
Are you prepared to gives us some figures VP, as to how much it's going to cost Turkey ( just from direct foreign investments alone) if their EU accession talks come to a dead end next year, if the Cyprus problem is not settled.?
As the saying goes,
"what goes around, comes around".!!
zan wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:humanist wrote:and your still not seeing a penny VP.....................
You are the bigger losers here the 4 billion dollars refers to lost "RoC" revenues for not being able to enter Turkish docks. The income for Turkey is miniscule in comparison.
Are you prepared to gives us some figures VP, as to how much it's going to cost Turkey ( just from direct foreign investments alone) if their EU accession talks come to a dead end next year, if the Cyprus problem is not settled.?
As the saying goes,
"what goes around, comes around".!!
Companies have 80,000,000 people to sell their wears to...You do the math
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests