EricSeans wrote:erecles,
Follow some of the north-based BBs and you'll see that there are some Brits there who are not afraid of speaking out against the immoral and ignorant who surround them.
I have read some and see you mean Eric Seans, Eric Seans, Eric Seans.
It is not beyond comprehension that buyers of pre 74 Turkish title property did not buy it on moral grounds but having done so are now pathetically taking the moral high ground.
It is interesting that the TC government has not given permission to foreigners to purchase Pre 74 Turkish title for several years but has noticeably kept this quiet, happy to see foreign cash coming into the country. This certainly could strengthen the argument that in any agreements that could be made with the GC government the TC government will have no second thoughts for the ex-pats, increasingly non-British, who they have desperately needed to bolster their economy.
Having said that the writers on this thread seem to be celebrating when there could well be nothing to celebrate.
I would not buy exchange land nor for the timebeing Turkish title either but to say that the majority of buyers of property which was in Greek hands prior to 74 are thieves is unwarranted. The information they get from estate agents and other interested parties is that GCs who previously possessed the property will not have lost out.
Could somebody please enlighten me on the situation of property in the south that was possessed by Turks pre 74?
Has any been leased on agreements that cannot immediately be terminated, sold, taken for industrial use, for airports etc?
This is a reasonable question not asked with any nasty intentions.