by vaughanwilliams » Fri Aug 29, 2008 1:29 pm
Nicole,
You really do have an interesting, if not uncommon, view of your countries recent history, typical of most GC's.
Quite what the UK's history of 200 years ago has to do with this debate, is not clear.
However, for all you supporters of legal action I refer you to your own government spokesman, Stefanos Stefanou who, refering to the Mike Tymvios case, said:
"...................that the court was not the place to solve the Cyprus problem."
“The Cyprus problem is primarily a political problem, a problem of invasion and occupation, with aspects relating to property, and it cannot be solved comprehensively through the courts,” he said.
The spokesman maintained this was always the view of AKEL, the party now in government.
“It’s a bizarre situation where a Greek Cypriot brought an action against Turkey and they settled for an exchange of property. And now, Turkey will be promoting the position of the Greek Cypriot in the Committee of Ministers because the Cyprus government has not given effect to the settlement,” .
The issue is complicated in more ways than one, since the Larnaca property in question contains two schools, residential homes and businesses.
If the government goes ahead and transfers ownership to Tymvios, the state would then probably be forced to requisition the land through a compulsory acquisition.
If the authorities refuse to do the paperwork, the government may be liable for not enforcing the settlement between Tymvios and Turkey as endorsed by the ECHR.
Time to make up your minds, guys.