Cyprus-Forum.com

[alekcen]

woow man, u must think a lot before writting all these!!! hi level writing. if u want proves u can find them and i can give u evidence if u want, u just have to be willing, and able to discuss. There are lot of sources we just close our eyes.

boomerang, my little boy, u should learn how to argue, is not hard it just need brain. I come here with arguments and all i hear from u guys is a personal attack without even trying to give a reaonable explanation ( if u can think of one), I dont blame u guys, i know how teenagers are, u will grow up, and become mature sometime.

Althoug am curious if u guys actually live in Cyprus?

[boomerang]

woow man, u must think a lot before writting all these!!! hi level writing. if u want proves u can find them and i can give u evidence if u want, u just have to be willing, and able to discuss. There are lot of sources we just close our eyes.

boomerang, my little boy, u should learn how to argue, is not hard it just need brain. I come here with arguments and all i hear from u guys is a personal attack without even trying to give a reaonable explanation ( if u can think of one), I dont blame u guys, i know how teenagers are, u will grow up, and become mature sometime.

Althoug am curious if u guys actually live in Cyprus?

come on be honest here...how hard did you squeeze...it sounded extra hard...

Whats that?....Louder please...no...not as in nicky fucking louder...you didn't get the minutes?....oh what a shame...


PS...you are not the brightest crayong in the box are you?

[alekcen]

hey man, it must be hard for u not to have a girl-friend, or any friends to play and go out with. I dont blaime u little kid, i just wish for u one day to be able to discuss, it would be really good to have a discussion with reall arguments .

Am really sorry but i have more importan things to do than this. Is my fault cause i thought u could really discuss. U will learn the meaning of the word discussing.

P.S I hope u find a girl soon, u will need it, is essential in forming the discussion mentality in someone.

[boomerang]

hey man, it must be hard for u not to have a girl-friend, or any friends to play and go out with. I dont blaime u little kid, i just wish for u one day to be able to discuss, it would be really good to have a discussion with reall arguments .

Am really sorry but i have more importan things to do than this. Is my fault cause i thought u could really discuss. U will learn the meaning of the word discussing.

P.S I hope u find a girl soon, u will need it, is essential in forming the discussion mentality in someone.

Thank you ohmaster....I will take that on board during the journey of my next life as this life is steadily fading away becoming a mere glimpse of yesterday...

But if I may suggest and hopefully returning your excellent advice into my next lifes journey, is for you to pull your head out of your ass as it really is a beautiful world we living in...you need the oxygen anyway...

[Bananiot]

Everything you said about Chrysostomos is true Alekcen but that was enough to raise the adrenaline of the nationalists of the forum. The Bishop is just a crook who actually hand picked the representatives that voted in the parallel election (what a system! Piratis democracy in action) and he managed to pass into the second round, despite getting less than 8% from the people.

Being a crook is also the trademark of most rejectionists and Chrysostomos is a bash rejectionists.

[alekcen]

I have to apologise first of all, cause i thought this was a group that people make discussion and dont get into this silly converstions and attack one another. I have to admit i cant keep my self from laughing especially from the way some guys here talk.

I really apologise, so from now on i will discuss with people who worth talking with it.
Am glad there are still some in this forum.

[boomerang]

do you 2 mind getting a room and spare us, the children that is, from obsenities?

[Bananiot]

Well, the nationalists will soon call you a traitor but, they seem to forget that as from February 17 2008 the opposite view is not vilified any more. It has been a long time, it seems, from those of fascist ambient atmosphere of Papadopoulos, which was cheered loudly by the forum bigots.

[Piratis]

Pirati, just for the records, u should know that the bishop himself has chosen the representatives that had voted in the central council of the church, does that sound dimocratic to u? for god sake, is simple maths, dont u know how to count??? he got 5% of the votes, 40% Athanasios ( limassol), and 40% Nikiforos ( kikkos) , so were do u see that he got there democratically?? do the maths man.

And where did I say that it was democratic? Can you show it to me? In fact I said the exact opposide: That the way he was elected was not democratic.

Here is what I said before he was elected in 2006:

You are confusing things. In Iran the religious leaders run the country. In Cyprus they just run their church.

In fact Cyprus is one of the few countries were people vote for the religious leader. For example I don't remember Catholics voting for the new Pope.

Now how much the vote of the people will count in the final result remains to be seen. If Chrysostomos becomes the Archbishop then I really see no reason why bother with elections next time.
http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.p ... 603#107603

What I asked you and you didn't answer is:
If you have a problem that the Archibishop, who after all is just a religious leader and has no authority, was elected in an undemocratic way, then how can you accept that goverment of Cyprus can be elected in such undemocratic ways? Would you accept it if somebody with such a low percentage of popular support would run Cyprus?

[Piratis]

Everything you said about Chrysostomos is true Alekcen but that was enough to raise the adrenaline of the nationalists of the forum. The Bishop is just a crook who actually hand picked the representatives that voted in the parallel election (what a system! Piratis democracy in action) and he managed to pass into the second round, despite getting less than 8% from the people.

You are so pathetic! You can not argue against me so you put words in my mouth and argue against your own imagination.

No Bananiot, the way the Archibishop was elected was not democratic and I was perfectly clear about this. However the Archbishop has no authority, and in fact in most other countries the religious leaders are not chosen in a democratic way by the people anyways.

Who is chosen democratically by the people in all democratic countries is their political leadership. So how can you complain that some religious leader was elected undemocratically and want to silence him because of this, and yet you are willing to accept that another person with equivalent popular support, not only can have an opinion, but he can also be the president of Cyprus or veto whatever the majority of the people want. Would you accept if Chrysostomos had such powers Bananiot?

I was always 100% clear about the kind of democracy I support. The definition of democracy that I fully agree with can be found here:
http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/w ... hatdm2.htm

Some Bananiots however remember democracy and the "53%" only when it suits them.

Being a crook is also the trademark of most rejectionists and Chrysostomos is a bash rejectionists.

Beign a crook, by definition, is a trademark of acceptionists. Rejectionists, reject crimes, reject human rights violations, reject illegalities, reject racist discrimination. Yet, the acceptionists are acceptionists because they accept all of the above.