AJK.GOV.PK wrote: Hurriyat leaders visit to Pakistan to help resolve Kashmir issue: Rashid
Information Minister Sheikh Rashid has said that Hurriyat leaders visit to Pakistan will help resolve Kashmir dispute.
"APHC leaders visit to Pakistan will help resolve Kashmir issue. It is a significant movement forward. " We understand that matters will be settled as a consequence of this visit", he said this while talking to the journalists on board the plane on the way from Ankara to Istanbul Thursday.
Sheikh Rashid held that Pakistan and Turkey were tied into historical bonds. Turkey had helped Pakistan in hard time and like wise Pakistan had stood by Turkey at the hour of trial. When sanctions were imposed on Turkey on purchase of arms, Pakistan had extended co-operation in supply of arms to Turkey.
He went on to say that visit of Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz would add momentum to bilateral relations between Pakistan and Turkey. The leadership of both the countries exchanged views on regional and global issues at length.
He reiterated that Pakistan supports Turkey on Cyprus issue. Like wise Turkey had supported Pakistan on Kashmir issue. Turkish President will soon visit Pakistan. He will exchange views with Pakistani leadership on important issues, Sheikh Rashid told. The bilateral relations between the two countries will grow further stable, he remarked.
He noted that Turkey was having historical sentiments for the President General Pervez Musharraf. Name of the President General Pervez Musharraf was specifically mentioned wherever we went in any meeting, he added.
About Karachi situation he said that city was returning to normalcy. Government will deal with the miscreants with iron hand.
Responding to a question Sheikh Rashid said that Pakistan and Turkey had agreed on enhancing co-operation in all spheres of activities including defence.
Last Updated ( Monday, 06 June 2005 )
link
PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS wrote:
KASHMIR DISPUTE
Pakistan 's principled position on Jammu and Kashmir is based on the UN Security Council Resolutions, which provide that the final disposition of Jammu and Kashmir will be made in accordance with the will of the people. Pakistan is committed to this position until the three parties to the dispute, Pakistan , India and the people of Jammu and Kashmir arrive at some mutually acceptable final settlement.
Pakistan has always emphasized the necessity of a meaningful, constructive and result oriented dialogue to resolve the Jammu and Kashmir dispute. Pakistan maintains that rigidity and aggression must give way to accommodation and flexibility.
In their struggle for self-determination, the Kashmiri people have undergone untold sufferings and hardship over the years. Pakistan believes that the Kashmiri people must be associated with the Pakistan-India dialogue process for arriving at a sustainable solution. Their legitimate aspirations cannot be ignored and must be accommodated in any just and durable solution.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The Kashmir dispute between Pakistan and India dates back to the partition of British India into two independent states in August 1947. At the time, the princely states under British suzerainty but not directly ruled by the British Government opted for joining either Pakistan or India taking into account their contiguity to one or the other country and the wishes of their people.
In the case of Jammu and Kashmir , the ruler was Hindu while the population was overwhelmingly Muslim and wanted to join Pakistan . India consistently pressurized the Hindu ruler to accede to India . Apprehending that the Hindu ruler was likely to succumb to Indian pressure, the people of Jammu and Kashmir rose against him, forcing him to flee from Srinagar . On 24th October 1947 they formed their own government. On 27th October, the Government of India announced that the Hindu ruler had acceded to India . This claim was made on the basis of a fraudulent instrument of accession. India sent its forces into the State and occupied a large part of Jammu and Kashmir . Indian leaders, including Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Viceroy Lord Mountbatten, solemnly declared that the people of the State would decide the final status of Jammu and Kashmir . For over half a century, the Kashmir dispute has bedeviled relations between Pakistan and India . Several efforts, for resolution of the issue, both at multilateral and bilateral levels have failed to show any meaningful result.
India took the matter to the UN Security Council in 1948. The UN Security Council through its Security Council Resolutions No. 47 (1948) , 51 (1948), 80 (1950) and the United Commission for India and Pakistan resolutions of 13 August 1948 and 5 January 1949 declared that accession of Jammu & Kashmir to India or Pakistan should be decided through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite. These UN resolutions were accepted by both India and Pakistan . Prime Minister Nehru declared before the Indian Parliament that India was committed to holding a free and fair plebiscite in Kashmir . However, India reneged on its commitment to hold plebiscite on the pretext of this stance.
In 1951 India projected the rigged assembly elections in the Indian occupied Kashmir as a substitute to the UN sponsored plebiscite. However, t he UN Security Council Resolution No.91 (1951) denied the authority of the Constituent Assembly to decide about the future of the state and reminded the parties that the final disposition of the state of Jammu & Kashmir is to be made in accordance with the will of the people of Kashmir . The UN Resolution No.122 (1957) reaffirmed the earlier resolution of 1951 stating that the elections could not be held as substitute to the plebiscite.
India now claims that Kashmir is an integral part of India . This contention is misleading and incorrect because of the following reasons:
• The disputed character of Jammu & Kashmir has been recognized by the UN, accepted by both India and Pakistan and endorsed by the international community.
• The Line of Control in the disputed area of Jammu & Kashmir is not an international boundary and recognized as such by India .
• There is complete alienation in the Indian occupied Kashmir (IoK) against the Indian rule.
• Pakistan and India in the Joint Statement of 6 January 2004 are committed to seeking a final settlement of the Jammu & Kashmir dispute.
Outside the UN, direct negotiations between Pakistan and India were held from the very inception of the dispute in 1947. Several rounds of negotiations held during the past five decades have not resulted in any meaningful or substantive progress as India adamantly maintained that the status quo cannot be changed.
Over half a century, the people of Kashmir are awaiting the exercise of their right to self-determination . Non-implementation of the Security Council resolutions coupled with the massive violations of the human rights by the Indian Security Forces has compelled the people of IoK to resist Indian occupation.
In 1989, the people of Jammu and Kashmir , inspired by similar movements for freedom in other parts of the world, rose against the Indian occupation. India sought to suppress their movement with massive use of force, killing hundreds of innocent men, women and children.
Since 1989, more than 90,000 Kashmiri people have been killed. There are over 700,000 Indian troops in IOK. There have been numerous cases of human rights violations. In spite of the brutal repression of the Indian Security forces, the peaceful struggle of the Kashmiri people continues undaunted.
In fact Indian state terrorism in Occupied Kashmir has become even more pronounced in the post September 11 phase. India has tried to use the global sentiment following the September 11 events to paint the Kashmiri freedom struggle as terrorism and its own repression of that indigenous freedom struggle as a means to fight against terrorism.
In an attempt to malign Pakistan and the Kashmiri freedom movement, India has stepped up its propaganda of cross LOC infiltration from Pakistan and our involvement in so-called cross border terrorism. These allegations are nothing but a ploy to shift focus from the massive violation of human rights being perpetrated by the Indian Security Forces in IOK. While making such baseless allegations, India refuses to allow a neutral mechanism to investigate these charges.
Pakistan has all along emphasized the need to further strengthen and enhance the monitoring of the LoC by the United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP). UNMOGIP is the UN's oldest peace-keeping operation.
http://www.mofa.gov.pk/Pages/Brief.htm
By what principles does Pakistan support Turkey in the Cyprus issue ?
By what principles does Turkey support Pakistan in the Kashmir issue ?
Is it simply Muslim solidarity ?
