turkcyp wrote:Please do not write in half sentences. I do not understand your point of view? What does the first sentence of the above post refers to?
reimbursed for the difference in property value.
sorry about that. i realized it didnt make sense. i just wanted to make sure that by reimbursement I was clear that they would get their properties back as well as the difference between their current property value and the current net worth of their property in the north. something which GCs are also willing to accept (ot the hen and the goose as you put it)
I got the point (a) but not point (b). Are you saying that TCs do not have right to political equality? If so read 1960 constitution and decide if we have rights to political equality or not. Also are you suggesting that if GCs get their property back they will give the political equality?
Point b means that TCs are entitle to political equality as much as GCs are entitled to ALL their land back.
The 1960 constituion also says all citizens have the right to free and safe enjoyment of their properties. Let's not only read whatever part benefits us turkcyp.