The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Here you go Bananiot...

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Oracle » Sun Aug 10, 2008 10:30 pm

Bananiot is mixed up with his Nationalism and Patriotism ... :roll:

He is ashamed of his past, and his present, and he wants to give his future away, so that he does not have to have the burden of a decision on what type of man he is ...
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Bananiot » Sun Aug 10, 2008 10:45 pm

Nationalism has nothing to do with patriotism, idiot (with the contemporary meaning of the word). Sotos, I want what the majority of Greek Cypriots want, a federal, bicommunal, bizonal Cyprus. If you have a problem with this you can apply to Christofias.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby miltiades » Sun Aug 10, 2008 10:57 pm

Sotos wrote::? Bananiot I am not Nationalist. But you know what is worst from a Greek Cypriot Nationalist? A Greek Cypriot who is Turkish Nationalist. Because you are Nationalist AND traitor at the same time! If you are going to support a country then why not support your own? Why support the Turks who want to make the north part of our island Turkish? Do your friends in occupied area accept to give back the north that they illegally occupy back to RoC and to their lawful inhabitants? If they want to steal our lands from us then they are enemy not friends!!!

Sotos , you are sometimes extremely stupid.
Calling Bananiot " a G/C who is a Turkish nationalist and a traitor " is pure unadulterated shit ! Do you think that ONLY YOU is a G/C and only YOU care about Cyprus ? His wife , his children and his dog
too are Cypriots who want a peaceful solution to the Cyprus problem .Do try and remember WHO invited Turkey to Cyprus !
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby Sotos » Sun Aug 10, 2008 11:05 pm

Bananiot wrote:Nationalism has nothing to do with patriotism, idiot (with the contemporary meaning of the word). Sotos, I want what the majority of Greek Cypriots want, a federal, bicommunal, bizonal Cyprus. If you have a problem with this you can apply to Christofias.


How do you know that the majority of Cypriots want that? If the Annan plan was BBF then we know that Cypriots do not want it. What I don't understand is why we didn't have a referendum to see if we accept BBF much earlier!
User avatar
Sotos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11357
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:50 am

Postby Kifeas » Sun Aug 10, 2008 11:19 pm

Bananiot wrote:Nationalism has nothing to do with patriotism, idiot (with the contemporary meaning of the word). Sotos, I want what the majority of Greek Cypriots want, a federal, bicommunal, bizonal Cyprus. If you have a problem with this you can apply to Christofias.


Bananiot, you have lost the plot, I am affraid! A federal, bi-communal, bi-zonal Cyprus is not what the majority of GCs want! A BBF Cyprus is what the majority of GCs are ready to compromise with, provided it is a form of governance and power sharing that does not eradicate or violate our human rights, our dignity, and all the rest of our legitimate interests and rights as a society! Don't tell us now that we should convert what we regard as our ultimate compromise -under the blackmail of Turkey's occupation, to an "ideal" under whose "banner" we must also be ready to die for!
User avatar
Kifeas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Lapithos, Kyrenia, now Pafos; Cyprus.

Postby Bananiot » Mon Aug 11, 2008 9:09 am

I know Kifeas, BBF with the correct content. You can fool someone sometimes but you can not fool all people all times.

Soon the two schools of thought will fight the last battle which will decide the fate of the war. On one side will be the nationalist forces that want a unitary Cyprus as first choice and partition as the next best choice and on the other side will be the forces of true Cypriots. This time round we will meet on a level playing field and I reckon the outcome is already decided.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby DT. » Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:30 am

Bananiot wrote:I know Kifeas, BBF with the correct content. You can fool someone sometimes but you can not fool all people all times.

Soon the two schools of thought will fight the last battle which will decide the fate of the war. On one side will be the nationalist forces that want a unitary Cyprus as first choice and partition as the next best choice and on the other side will be the forces of true Cypriots. This time round we will meet on a level playing field and I reckon the outcome is already decided.


If the true Cypriots are the GC's who voted for the AP then you deserve an island all to yourselves.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Bananiot » Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:33 am

So you want to banish 100 000 voters along with their families to some island ...

Just to make it more clear to you. We voted for the dreaded Plan (despite the constant harassment) because we considered the Annan Plan a far better proposition than partition. We did not fall for the lies of the President that within a week of saying no we would get a better, european so called solution. This is the important difference between us and the rejectionists who have finaly come to terms with what Denktsh has been saying all along. We cannot accept that partition is the the next best solution, even if it is on a 90-10% basis.

Thus, we embark on a new effort to find a solution based on the only viable option of BBF where the two communities will be politically equal and each one will be in charge of its component state. The working groups have made significant progres on governance and this may be the catalyst for a final solution.

Again, whatever the outcome, the people will decide with a referendun but now the game will be played in an even field and one can already hear the cries of the rejectionists that have started in "Phileleftheros" and the satanic "Ethnos" which had the cheek to accuse Glafkos Klerides of being a nazi spy. Klerides, being the gentleman he is, never bothered to take them to court and it seems they are at it again, playing the game they know best.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby DT. » Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:41 am

Bananiot wrote:So you want to banish 100 000 voters along with their families to some island ...

Just to make it more clear to you. We voted for the dreaded Plan (despite the constant harassment) because we considered the Annan Plan a far better proposition than partition. We did not fall for the lies of the President that within a week of saying no we would get a better, european so called solution. This is the important difference between us and the rejectionists who have finaly come to terms with what Denktsh has been saying all along. We cannot accept that partition is the the next best solution, even if it is on a 90-10% basis.

Thus, we embark on a new effort to find a solution based on the only viable option of BBF where the two communities will be politically equal and each one will be in charge of its component state. The working groups have made significant progres on governance and this may be the catalyst for a final solution.

Again, whatever the outcome, the people will decide with a referendun but now the game will be played in an even field and one can already hear the cries of the rejectionists that have started in "Phileleftheros" and the satanic "Ethnos" which had the cheek to accuse Glafkos Klerides of being a nazi spy. Klerides, being the gentleman he is, never bothered to take them to court and it seems they are at it again, playing the game they know best.


Bananiot you committed no bravery so stop describing it as such. You used your democratic right to vote and in my opinion voted for the dangerous option.

YOU YOURSELF HAVE STATED THAT DENKTASH HAD THE ARMY READY TO INTERVENE HAD WE VOTED YES! WHat would happen then Bananiot? How would we deal with the future as a statelet?

Are we disturbing you acceptionist views too much by requesting sensible protections? Like no virgin birth, no gaurantees and no presence of any army? Are we annoying you by reqesting a fairer distribution of land?
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Nikitas » Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:45 am

We will see the interim arrangement of this new plan. If it has the same military provisions during the interim period we will know who hatched it and why. The interim arrangements tell a lot about the intentinons of each side.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest