Cyprus-Forum.com

[ttoli]

Athens Court of Appeal dtd. March 21, 1979: The court decision reads as follows:

"The Turkish intervention in Cyprus, which was carried out in accordance with the London-Zurich agreements, was legal. Turkey had, as one of the Guarantor Powers, the right to fulfill her obligation. The true guilty ones were the Greek Officers, who organised the coup and thereby created the conditions for an intervention."

[Oracle]

Bad luck Lobster .... this was done to death!

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/cyprus18664.html

[zan]

Athens Court of Appeal dtd. March 21, 1979: The court decision reads as follows:

"The Turkish intervention in Cyprus, which was carried out in accordance with the London-Zurich agreements, was legal. Turkey had, as one of the Guarantor Powers, the right to fulfill her obligation. The true guilty ones were the Greek Officers, who organised the coup and thereby created the conditions for an intervention."

They don't need to follow any resolutıons or court decısıons ttolı.....They own the world.

[alexISS]

Athens Court of Appeal dtd. March 21, 1979: The court decision reads as follows:

"The Turkish intervention in Cyprus, which was carried out in accordance with the London-Zurich agreements, was legal. Turkey had, as one of the Guarantor Powers, the right to fulfill her obligation. The true guilty ones were the Greek Officers, who organised the coup and thereby created the conditions for an intervention."

Any links to verify the validity of the above?

Except of course the well known Turkish propaganda site from which you copied it...
http://www.tallarmeniantale.com/cyprus.htm

[Kifeas]

Athens Court of Appeal dtd. March 21, 1979: The court decision reads as follows:

"The Turkish intervention in Cyprus, which was carried out in accordance with the London-Zurich agreements, was legal. Turkey had, as one of the Guarantor Powers, the right to fulfill her obligation. The true guilty ones were the Greek Officers, who organised the coup and thereby created the conditions for an intervention."

When in a year's time, momma Turka will be receiving the boot and get thrown out of her EU accession process, due to its illegal occupation of Cyprus and the continuing for 35 years violation of 1/3 its peoples' human rights, then you will find out how legal or illegal her invasion and occupation of Cyprus is! I hope she (momma Turka) also chooses to become the laughing stock of the entire planet, by siding the above ridiculous claim as defence.

[zan]

Athens Court of Appeal dtd. March 21, 1979: The court decision reads as follows:

"The Turkish intervention in Cyprus, which was carried out in accordance with the London-Zurich agreements, was legal. Turkey had, as one of the Guarantor Powers, the right to fulfill her obligation. The true guilty ones were the Greek Officers, who organised the coup and thereby created the conditions for an intervention."

Any links to verify the validity of the above?

Except of course the well known Turkish propaganda site from which you copied it...
http://www.tallarmeniantale.com/cyprus.htm

The legitimacy of the Turkish intervention was also confirmed, among others, by the Council of Europe Resolution 573 (1974) and even by the Athens Court of Appeal.

[alexISS]

Athens Court of Appeal dtd. March 21, 1979: The court decision reads as follows:

"The Turkish intervention in Cyprus, which was carried out in accordance with the London-Zurich agreements, was legal. Turkey had, as one of the Guarantor Powers, the right to fulfill her obligation. The true guilty ones were the Greek Officers, who organised the coup and thereby created the conditions for an intervention."

Any links to verify the validity of the above?

Except of course the well known Turkish propaganda site from which you copied it...
http://www.tallarmeniantale.com/cyprus.htm

The legitimacy of the Turkish intervention was also confirmed, among others, by the Council of Europe Resolution 573 (1974) and even by the Athens Court of Appeal.

Ah, more copying and pasting, this time from here
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/200 ... in-cyprus/

It's a pity that the author of the above, mr Kavlak (interesting name), did not include an extract from the 573 resolution, just like it's a pity noone seems capable of finding the decision of the Athens court of appeal

[Kifeas]

Athens Court of Appeal dtd. March 21, 1979: The court decision reads as follows:

"The Turkish intervention in Cyprus, which was carried out in accordance with the London-Zurich agreements, was legal. Turkey had, as one of the Guarantor Powers, the right to fulfill her obligation. The true guilty ones were the Greek Officers, who organised the coup and thereby created the conditions for an intervention."

Any links to verify the validity of the above?

Except of course the well known Turkish propaganda site from which you copied it...
http://www.tallarmeniantale.com/cyprus.htm

The legitimacy of the Turkish intervention was also confirmed, among others, by the Council of Europe Resolution 573 (1974) and even by the Athens Court of Appeal.

The clock is ticking Zan! Just wait for another one year, until September 2009, when you will receive the boot with a RoC /GC veto that will completely throw your mommy out of her EU accession process, and try to make use of the above arguments! Then I want you to call upon the “Athens’s court of appeal” and the CoE, to explain to the EU that your invasion and occupation of Cyprus were /are "legal!" The clock is ticking Zan! Just count the days left for you find out how “legal” it was, but do not come here crying for being deceived due to your own foolishness!

[zan]

Athens Court of Appeal dtd. March 21, 1979: The court decision reads as follows:

"The Turkish intervention in Cyprus, which was carried out in accordance with the London-Zurich agreements, was legal. Turkey had, as one of the Guarantor Powers, the right to fulfill her obligation. The true guilty ones were the Greek Officers, who organised the coup and thereby created the conditions for an intervention."

Any links to verify the validity of the above?

Except of course the well known Turkish propaganda site from which you copied it...
http://www.tallarmeniantale.com/cyprus.htm

The legitimacy of the Turkish intervention was also confirmed, among others, by the Council of Europe Resolution 573 (1974) and even by the Athens Court of Appeal.

Ah, more copying and pasting, this time from here
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/200 ... in-cyprus/

It's a pity that the author of the above, mr Kavlak (interesting name), did not include an extract from the 573 resolution, just like it's a pity noone seems capable of finding the decision of the Athens court of appeal

Are you gıvıng out medals for good essays then allexISS ???? Sorry but I am lazy ands when I fınd somethıng that says what I have to say then I copy and paste wıthout shame.....

[alexISS]

Athens Court of Appeal dtd. March 21, 1979: The court decision reads as follows:

"The Turkish intervention in Cyprus, which was carried out in accordance with the London-Zurich agreements, was legal. Turkey had, as one of the Guarantor Powers, the right to fulfill her obligation. The true guilty ones were the Greek Officers, who organised the coup and thereby created the conditions for an intervention."

Any links to verify the validity of the above?

Except of course the well known Turkish propaganda site from which you copied it...
http://www.tallarmeniantale.com/cyprus.htm

The legitimacy of the Turkish intervention was also confirmed, among others, by the Council of Europe Resolution 573 (1974) and even by the Athens Court of Appeal.

Ah, more copying and pasting, this time from here
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/200 ... in-cyprus/

It's a pity that the author of the above, mr Kavlak (interesting name), did not include an extract from the 573 resolution, just like it's a pity noone seems capable of finding the decision of the Athens court of appeal

Are you gıvıng out medals for good essays then allexISS ???? Sorry but I am lazy ands when I fınd somethıng that says what I have to say then I copy and paste wıthout shame.....

Zan, the sentence you pasted was irrelevant to my question, which you supposedly attempted to answer by quoting it. If you HAVE to express yourself through the words of others, at least make sure they are on the subject