Cyprus-Forum.com

[zan]

RESTORING legal order, is what would have been legal, as Ionas notes above.

What kind of twisted mind thinks that the results of the 1974 invasion constitute RESTORATION!

Like they say, you really learn about someone when you see how they behave when they have power. We learned OK.

Retore ıt to whom and under what treaty......

Restore it to the status prior to the Greek coup, or else you (the invader) admit that the reason for your "intervention" was not the coup, but your desire to expand your borders

Mıne was to save our lıves and our rıghtful place ın Cyprus...I thınk Greece was the one that wanted to expand ıts borders wıth ıts orıgınal ınvasıon and attempted assasınatıon of Makarıos. Then when Makarıos returned he wanted to make changes to the Zurıch agreement so we had a few changes of our own...The rest ıs hıstory as they say!!!

[miltiades]

And soon the EU will re write history !!!

[Nikitas]

So we all agree then that the situation now is a free for all and the Zurich thing is dead? Because if we all agree then we can regulate our demands accordingly.

As for the question of restore what posed by Zan it is simple, restore according to the rules which Turkey itself invoked inorder to invade. If it did not rely on those rules then it plays the exact same game as the junta, but then we knew that all along.