Nikitas wrote:VP ans Zan,
Refer to the decisions of the Spanish authorities to reverse coastal development inorder to INCREASE the value of their investment and then please read carefully my post which stresses how value is increased when SOME parts of the landscape are left in their natural state.
Now let us think, if Ayia Napa in the south had five super luxury hotels and the surrounding area was left as it was in the 50s, would the total revenue brough in by tourism be more or less than now? It would be more, I say, but there should be a way to pay the owners of the surrounding land for not converting it to plots and building it. It is a simple concept but very hard to apply fairly. So people "develop" the land and in the long run lose money.
The above applies to both sides of Cyprus, which inspite of what some people think, is not an overly beautiful island. The Cypriot countryside is actually very ordinary and it PAYS us all to keep the few impressive parts intact. The sand dunes of Karpasia are one such place, Akamas is another. I would have added the Pendadaktylos range but that was buggered up a long time ago.
We have not had the luxury of picking and choosing on how to develop in anything we do Nikitas. You seem to forget the siege we are under and how we need to make a living and support some sort of infrastructure that you have had a free hand in. please remember to put all the facts into your equation when making assumptions about anything that happens in the TRNC. You will not fool yourself into a false sense of security if you do. In a perfect world then I would agree with you whole heartedly but you have not allowed us a perfect world.