achilles wrote:suetoniuspaulinus wrote:Mr Achilles
Thank you for your courtesy
I too look forward to a constuctive future of close rounds.
If we don't solve our problems then I believe a "solution" will be imposed upon us.
I am totally certain that we will never agree on eveything. But if we can agree on one thing then its a start. We can at least agree to disagree.
I couldnt agree more. Yet, i need to let you know that my personal gratification would be optimized, if you called me just achilles.
Excessive formalities hardly ever lead to fruitful dialectic outcomes.
Have a good one.
Murtaza wrote:suetoniuspaulinus wrote:Murtaza wrote:suetoniuspaulinus wrote:suetoniuspaulinus wrote:Mr Achilles
I do not think that "serious discussion" is within your capabilities.
Mr Achilles
As much as it pains me I must retract my comment
lol thanks for a good laughing.
Hello Mr Murtaza
I'm pleased you found my response amusing but unfortunately as you can see I was wrong.
In a previous post I used a famous idiom "every dog has his day" and this proves it.
I need to be as certain of my "facts" as you are with yours
Mr suetoniuspaulinus
Well to make a mistake can be forgiven but to persist a mistake cannot
So I hope I can make mistake and admit it like you.
You make best!
I salute you with respect.
I think I should learn from you.
suetoniuspaulinus wrote:achilles wrote:suetoniuspaulinus wrote:Mr Achilles
Thank you for your courtesy
I too look forward to a constuctive future of close rounds.
If we don't solve our problems then I believe a "solution" will be imposed upon us.
I am totally certain that we will never agree on eveything. But if we can agree on one thing then its a start. We can at least agree to disagree.
I couldnt agree more. Yet, i need to let you know that my personal gratification would be optimized, if you called me just achilles.
Excessive formalities hardly ever lead to fruitful dialectic outcomes.
Have a good one.
Mr Achilles
Obviously, I MUST Disagree with you
To come to the point where you and I can agree on two things in one evening might make the rest of the forum suspicious of our motives
I do not in any way wish to diminish your personal gratification and so in future I will AGREE to call you simply Achilles.
achilles wrote:cannedmoose wrote:Did you swallow a dictionary Kirios Achilleas?
Oh well...its just those rare moments during which inspiration knocks the door of a layman
suetoniuspaulinus wrote:cannedmoose wrote:Did you swallow a dictionary Kirios Achilleas?
Mr cannedmoose
Whose Empire?
achilles wrote:suetoniuspaulinus wrote:achilles wrote:suetoniuspaulinus wrote:Mr Achilles
Thank you for your courtesy
I too look forward to a constuctive future of close rounds.
If we don't solve our problems then I believe a "solution" will be imposed upon us.
I am totally certain that we will never agree on eveything. But if we can agree on one thing then its a start. We can at least agree to disagree.
I couldnt agree more. Yet, i need to let you know that my personal gratification would be optimized, if you called me just achilles.
Excessive formalities hardly ever lead to fruitful dialectic outcomes.
Have a good one.
Mr Achilles
Obviously, I MUST Disagree with you
To come to the point where you and I can agree on two things in one evening might make the rest of the forum suspicious of our motives
I do not in any way wish to diminish your personal gratification and so in future I will AGREE to call you simply Achilles.
With the danger of diffusing obnoxious rumours to the forum, once the two of us agree on 3 consecutive issues in one day,i will humbly ask you to propose a more convenient and thus more ergonomic username in the place of suetoniuspaulinus, since the latter erodes the clarity of my thinking, hinders my ability to type quickly and consicely, and transforms part of the linguistic segment of my brain into useless detritus
Shall we settle this by allowing me to call you simply 'paulinus', given that you have no preferrable alternatives to propose?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests