In light of this I also started doing some research to see what the real historical issue is behind bizonality:
The idea of a bizonal federation was invoked in the 1977 "High Level Agreement" between Denkatsh and Makarios
trncgov.com wrote:1977 - Denktash-Makarios High Level Agreement. Principle of bi-zonality and bi-communality were agreed to. These were to form the basis of a future settlement of the Cyprus question.
However this is not exactly the case. From reading the I understood how the opinions of many TCs are formed about this topic - from misinformed facts. What happened in 1977 was that bizonality was discussed but never really agreed to because of the parties different respect to the matter:
Makarios wrote:I accept a federal solution to our problem under conditions safeguarding the independence and the unity of the Cyprus State. Freedom of movement, freedom of settlement and the right to property are basic prerequisites of a federation.
( cyprus-conflict.net)
So if Denctash accepted the above, then yes this is what was agreed to be a bizonal arrangement. He, of course, did not. He did however manage to contradict himself. WHen asked if he accepts the right to property Denctash said Accepted but when asked if refugees will get to return he said "In no event will all refugees be allowed to return".
What does everyone think about bizonality?