by Tim Drayton » Wed Jul 23, 2008 1:49 pm
I was challenged on another thread to back up my claim that there exists a distinct Turkish Cypriot culture.
I thought that this was such a broad topic that it deserved a thread of its own. I also didn't feel that I was the best qualified person to respond so I have waited to see what others have to say.
Well, I would now like to add some thoughts of my own.
I have no doubt that there exists a unique Turkish Cypriot culture. Anybody who is familiar with both mainland Turks and Turkish Cypriots is well aware of the difference. Just as everybody who knows, say, the Americans and the British realises that there are cultural differences between the two. However, how do you actually qualify and quantify this cultural difference that one so easily perceives viscerally? Culture manifests itself in so many ways: forms of dress, way of speaking, mannerisms, rules of social interaction, attitudes ... The list is never ending. It would take a book to do justice to this question.
Four areas immediately come to my mind where there are clear cultural differences between mainland Turks and Turkish Cypriots:
1 Language
Language and culture are considered to be closely related to one another. The dialect of Turkish traditionally spoken by Turkish Cypriots differs greatly from standard Turkish. So much so that some would argue that it is a separate language in its own right. It has only recently occured to me that this linguistic divergence does not only apply to informal language. Turkish Cypriot legal language uses quite a few terms which are not used in Turkey: some of these are anachronyms which have dropped out of use in Turkey itself while others, I think, are uniquely Cypriot. The existence of a very distinctive language is strong evidence in favour of a separate culture.
2 Traditional food, drink, music, dance, story-telling
As far as the above are concerned, I see no difference whatsoever between the two communities in Cyprus. These are all different from what you will find in Turkey. This is all strong evidence that over the milenia Turkish Cypriots integrated into a wider Cypriot culture.
3 Religion
The thing that most strikes mainland Turks who come to the north of Cyprus is that religion plays virtually no role whatsoever in the daily lives of Turkish Cypriots. The exact reverse applies in Turkey. One consequence of this was the way that the Turkish Cypriot community totally embraced the Kemalist reforms following the founding of the Turkish Republic. Here we are talking about a direct influence from the "motherland", but even so the ready acceptance that Kemalism found among Turkish Cypriots, when the same ideology met with considerable opposition among certain sections of Turkish society, points to the existence of a different cultural environment which predisposed people to welcome modernisation with open arms. There is stark evidence of this difference when you compare the fight currently going on in Turkey between secularists and Islamists with the kind of debate which characterises Turkish Cypriot political life. Secularism is not an issue in among the latter community: Turkish Cypriot society is virtually 100% secular.
4. Social and private space
Turkish Cypriots are far more reserved than mainland Turks. They are less likely to strike up casual conversations with strangers. It takes longer to get to know them, although they often turn out to be more sincere and genuine when you do.
Mainland Turks' concept of "social space", in the sense that this term is used by sociologists, is narrower. People stand closer together when speaking and are also much more tactile. I have yet to see two Turkish Cypriot men kiss each other on the cheeks when meeting. Turkish Cypriots shake hands less, too.
I also notice a much greater respect for concepts of privacy and individualism among Turkish Cypriots. Mainland Turkish society is very normative and peer pressures to conform is strong. Turkish Cypriots have more acceptance of deviance within certain boundaries. In Cyprus, people have more of a private life and worry less about what is going on behind closed doors.
Incidentally, I find the above attributes to be very British, and wonder if this is the result of influence by the former colonial power.
For reasons that are probably related to the above, I find that Turkish Cypriots are generally more broad minded and open to fresh ideas. Disagreements are far more likely to be settled verbally and I have never seen Turkish Cypriots brawling in the street in the way that from time to time you see Turks in the mainland doing.
I will stop there. I hope people can accept the above as being the genuine comments of an outside observer, who may be mistaken in some of his perceptions. I hope I have given no offence.