by Feisty » Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:29 pm
Oracle wrote:How can an affidavit be propaganda?
It is a written declaration upon oath made before an authorized official.
by boomerang » Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:29 pm
Feisty wrote:boomerang wrote:Feisty wrote:boomerang wrote:Feisty wrote:boomerang wrote:Feisty wrote:I am at present reading the affadavit and make the first point
I am puzzled that a planning application was made just for Conor's house and not for the full development as I believe is normal. That is not normal practice at all.
Is it not that permission is given en block for a development and then when the whole development is finished there is a final inspection to ensure the original application has been adherred to?
Feisty you looking more and more stupid with each post...give it a break...the builder is on record...conor all he has is hearsay...blind freddie can see who is in the right here...
conor is trying to milk the builder...
The builder is on record where?
what I see here feisty is that you are deaf, dumb and blind...
here read this and this time without the bloody blinkers...or use the coke bottles ffs...
http://www.karayiannas.com.cy/page.php
That is as much on record as anything else that has been said. You don't seem to be able to recognise that fact. It is not a statement that has been made to a court of law or to the investigating police but merely a piece of propaganda.
I never said it was idiot...but is public record now the developer offering money back, something conor the swindler denied with hearsay..
Man how thick can you get...fuck me...
F**k you? No thank you. I'm fussy about what I touch and a foul mouth such as yours wouldn't get near me.
I can't be bothered with you idiocy any more. I have better things to do with my time.
by boomerang » Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:30 pm
Feisty wrote:Oracle wrote:How can an affidavit be propaganda?
It is a written declaration upon oath made before an authorized official.
Well hopefully he'll get done for perjury then if it's lies won't it?
It may be a written declaration but as far as I'm aware it's not been presented to any authoritative figure.
by Feisty » Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:31 pm
boomerang wrote:Feisty wrote:boomerang wrote:Feisty wrote:boomerang wrote:Feisty wrote:Oracle wrote:Things are done in stages aren't they?
Yes they most certainly are built in stages but outline plans which permission is given on is normally for the whole development.
have you got any proof of this or are you shooting straight from your ass on this one...
the planning was for subdivision of the blocks...not the dwellings...normal practice...
A developer will apply for permit for a subdivision...the dwellings are secondary as each dwelling is different...
Precisely. Each dwelling is different to fit in with the strict criteria of floor space laid down for a complete site.
You seem to shoot the same stuff from your mouth as you do from your ass Boomerang.
If shit was power feisty you would be a power station...
show me proof of the fact that
1...the builder got a permit for subdivision
2...the builder got another permit for the dwelling...
or you think both permits are included into one...
Has it ever occur to you that an individual might not want the dwelling that the builder is offering and he wants a different dwelling?
what you are saying is that one permit is given for both...which is totally wrong...
I've never come across this developer so cannot comment so can only comment on my own experiences of 7 preperty purchases.
I've asked on 2 occasions for a different dwelling to be built and both times been turned down because of the strict build square meterage.
well shut the fuck up then you moron...and no one gives a shit what you went through...judging by the way you think I would say you are one fucked up individual...were you dropped on your head as child or rattling too many zips...
by boomerang » Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:32 pm
Feisty wrote:boomerang wrote:Feisty wrote:boomerang wrote:Feisty wrote:boomerang wrote:Feisty wrote:Oracle wrote:Things are done in stages aren't they?
Yes they most certainly are built in stages but outline plans which permission is given on is normally for the whole development.
have you got any proof of this or are you shooting straight from your ass on this one...
the planning was for subdivision of the blocks...not the dwellings...normal practice...
A developer will apply for permit for a subdivision...the dwellings are secondary as each dwelling is different...
Precisely. Each dwelling is different to fit in with the strict criteria of floor space laid down for a complete site.
You seem to shoot the same stuff from your mouth as you do from your ass Boomerang.
If shit was power feisty you would be a power station...
show me proof of the fact that
1...the builder got a permit for subdivision
2...the builder got another permit for the dwelling...
or you think both permits are included into one...
Has it ever occur to you that an individual might not want the dwelling that the builder is offering and he wants a different dwelling?
what you are saying is that one permit is given for both...which is totally wrong...
I've never come across this developer so cannot comment so can only comment on my own experiences of 7 preperty purchases.
I've asked on 2 occasions for a different dwelling to be built and both times been turned down because of the strict build square meterage.
well shut the fuck up then you moron...and no one gives a shit what you went through...judging by the way you think I would say you are one fucked up individual...were you dropped on your head as child or rattling too many zips...
You are a disgusting foul mouthed individual and very indicative of certain individuals that one wouldn't want to have anything to do with.
by boomerang » Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:39 pm
Feisty wrote:I'm not any further.
I've just made a complaint to admin regarding your abusive behaviour and foul language.
Good afternnon.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
