by Feisty » Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:02 pm
Oracle wrote:Things are done in stages aren't they?
by boomerang » Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:03 pm
Feisty wrote:I am at present reading the affadavit and make the first point
I am puzzled that a planning application was made just for Conor's house and not for the full development as I believe is normal. That is not normal practice at all.
Is it not that permission is given en block for a development and then when the whole development is finished there is a final inspection to ensure the original application has been adherred to?
by Feisty » Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:06 pm
boomerang wrote:Feisty wrote:I am at present reading the affadavit and make the first point
I am puzzled that a planning application was made just for Conor's house and not for the full development as I believe is normal. That is not normal practice at all.
Is it not that permission is given en block for a development and then when the whole development is finished there is a final inspection to ensure the original application has been adherred to?
Feisty you looking more and more stupid with each post...give it a break...the builder is on record...conor all he has is hearsay...blind freddie can see who is in the right here...
conor is trying to milk the builder...
by boomerang » Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:06 pm
Feisty wrote:Oracle wrote:Things are done in stages aren't they?
Yes they most certainly are built in stages but outline plans which permission is given on is normally for the whole development.
by Oracle » Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:08 pm
Feisty wrote:Oracle wrote:Things are done in stages aren't they?
Yes they most certainly are built in stages but outline plans which permission is given on is normally for the whole development. I'd hazard a guess they are certainly not made for a house in the middle of a site with plots either side.
Conor has said the plans he was shown were for a bungalow either side.
by Feisty » Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:08 pm
boomerang wrote:Feisty wrote:Oracle wrote:Things are done in stages aren't they?
Yes they most certainly are built in stages but outline plans which permission is given on is normally for the whole development.
have you got any proof of this or are you shooting straight from your ass on this one...
the planning was for subdivision of the blocks...not the dwellings...normal practice...
A developer will apply for permit for a subdivision...the dwellings are secondary as each dwelling is different...
by boomerang » Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:08 pm
Feisty wrote:boomerang wrote:Feisty wrote:I am at present reading the affadavit and make the first point
I am puzzled that a planning application was made just for Conor's house and not for the full development as I believe is normal. That is not normal practice at all.
Is it not that permission is given en block for a development and then when the whole development is finished there is a final inspection to ensure the original application has been adherred to?
Feisty you looking more and more stupid with each post...give it a break...the builder is on record...conor all he has is hearsay...blind freddie can see who is in the right here...
conor is trying to milk the builder...
The builder is on record where?
by boomerang » Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:12 pm
Feisty wrote:boomerang wrote:Feisty wrote:Oracle wrote:Things are done in stages aren't they?
Yes they most certainly are built in stages but outline plans which permission is given on is normally for the whole development.
have you got any proof of this or are you shooting straight from your ass on this one...
the planning was for subdivision of the blocks...not the dwellings...normal practice...
A developer will apply for permit for a subdivision...the dwellings are secondary as each dwelling is different...
Precisely. Each dwelling is different to fit in with the strict criteria of floor space laid down for a complete site.
You seem to shoot the same stuff from your mouth as you do from your ass Boomerang.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
